Cyanotiphia Cameron, 1907
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5584.4.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5E57B4DE-C868-4D1E-A6D7-37F612A91E71 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14853714 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ABD609-A02E-FFDC-FF5B-92B8B1FCF90F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyanotiphia Cameron, 1907 |
status |
|
Genus Cyanotiphia Cameron, 1907
Cyanotiphia Cameron, 1907: 287 , ♀; Hedicke 1936: 28, ♀; Allen 1969: 372, ♀; Kimsey 1991: 437, ♀; Saini et al. 2022: 88 View Cited Treatment , ♀, ♂.
Type species. Cyanotiphia ruficauda Cameron, 1907: 287 , 288, by original designation and monotypy.
Diagnosis. Dorsal and lateral pronotum with dense punctures; disc of propodeum laterally with at least one complete, longitudinal carina running from anterior to posterior margin of this area and posteriorly connected with transverse carina ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 12 View FIGURES 9–16 ); posterior surface of propodeum with radial wrinkles ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 12 View FIGURES 9–16 ); vein 2RS incomplete, not reaching RS+M ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ); tegula distinctly large, slightly shorter than mesonotum ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ); mid tibia with two spurs apically; anterior T1 separated by distinct transverse carina followed by short longitudinal wrinkles ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ); T1 densely punctate, with posterior margin impunctate ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ); S1 laterally with strongly raised carina ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1–8 , 14 View FIGURES 9–16 ); in female, mid and hind femora cylindrical, not flat ( Allen 1969; Cameron 1907; Saini et al. 2022; Tsuneki 1986).
Species included. There are three species in this genus: C. breviclypeola Feng, Chen & Li , sp. nov., C. fenchihuensis ( Tsuneki, 1986) , comb. nov., and C. ruficauda Cameron, 1907 .
Distribution. China ( Taiwan, *Guangdong, *Chongqing), Indonesia (North Sumatra, East Java), Malaysia (Sabah, Sarawak).
Remarks. The three genera, Cyanotiphia Cameron, 1907 , Tiphia Fabricius, 1775 , and Paratiphia Sichel, 1864 are more or less similar in morphology. Cyanotiphia Cameron differs from Tiphia Fabricius in these characters: dorsal and lateral pronotum with dense punctures; disc of propodeum laterally with at least one complete, longitudinal carina running from anterior to posterior margin of this area and posteriorly connected with transverse carina ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 12 View FIGURES 9–16 ); posterior surface of propodeum with radial wrinkles ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 12 View FIGURES 9–16 ); mid tibia with two spurs apically; and anterior T1 separated by distinct transverse carina followed by short longitudinal wrinkles ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ). Cyanotiphia Cameron differs from Paratiphia Sichel by the following: lateral pronotum in the male without a prominent, forward directed process; ventral aspect of hind femur without a carina in female ( Saini et al. 2022); tegula distinctly large, slightly shorter than mesonotum ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ); propodeum posteriorly with only one transverse carina ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–8 , 12 View FIGURES 9–16 ); lateral T1 without an abruptly depressed, finely setiferous plaque ( Allen 1968); abdominal segments with posterior margin impunctate ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–8 , 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cyanotiphia Cameron, 1907
Feng, Zi-Yan, Chen, Bin & Li, Ting-Jing 2025 |
Cyanotiphia
Saini, J. & Gupta, D. & Gupta, K. C. S. K. 2022: 88 |
Kimsey, L. S. 1991: 437 |
Allen, H. W. 1969: 372 |
Hedicke, H. 1936: 28 |
Cameron, P. 1907: 287 |