Sinomophorus Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4438.3.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:439C6BBB-393A-470C-9332-383351BFAD2A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5984014 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03AE8372-C82B-4256-87FF-A063F373FA63 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sinomophorus Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011 |
status |
|
Subgenus Sinomophorus Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011
Type species. Omophorus rongshu Wang, Alonso-Zarazaga, Ren & Zhang, 2011: 44 .
Diagnosis (modified based on Wang et al. (2011)). Distinguished from nominal subgenus by the absence of tubercle on pronotal surface; bifid vestiture of the venter; the obtuse humeral angle; extremely small extent of sclerotization in the endophallus; absence of styli in the ovipositor and the absence of a spiculum ventrale on female sternite VIII. It can be separated from the subgenus Pangomophorus Voss, 1960 by the bifid vestiture of the venter; the obtuse humeral angle; and the presence of a metatibial uncus. Several diagnostic characters, including longer antennal club; elongate subtrapezoidal scutellum and smaller subhumeral calli, proposed in Wang et al. (2011) are considered invalid for a new subgeneric delimitation on the basis of the comparison between O. ( S.) rongshu and O. ( S.) wallacei (see details in discussion).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |