Rubus egregius, Focke
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.293200 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B0402C-FFE1-E348-FEC7-F165D3FBFA8A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rubus egregius |
status |
|
32. R. egregius Focke View in CoL , Abh. Nat. Ver. Bremen 2: 463 (1871).
Stems rather weak, arcuate, procumbent or climbing, glabrescent, not pruinose, with few or no stalked glands or acides; prickles short, subulate, yellow to orange. Leaves mostly ternate, often rather small, tomentose-pubescent beneath; terminal leaflet suborbicular-obovate, acuminate, cordate at base, finely or coarsely serrate. Inflorescence a dense, long, tapering panicle, with very long, many-flowered lower branches, hairy, slightly glandular and with rather weak prickles; flowers rather large. Sepals patent, becoming deflexed; petals obovate, white; stamens exceeding the green styles; carpels and receptacle glabrous or glabrescent. Fruit of 15-20 rather large drupelets. 2zz = 28. N.W. & C. Europe. Au Be Br D a Ga Ge Hb He Ho. Varies greatly in leaf-form and -toothing. Related species include:
R. ceticus Halâcsy, Verh. Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien 41: 244 (1891). Au.
R. lespinassei Clavaud, Act. Soc. Linn. Bordeaux 37: iii (1883) ( R. coutinhoi Samp. ). Ga Hs Lu.
R. lindleianus Lees , Phytologist (Newman) 3:361 (1848). 2n = 28. Be Br Ga Ge Hb Ho.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rubus egregius
Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M. & Webb, D. A. 1981 |
R. egregius
Focke 1871: 463 |