Amritodus brevis Viraktamath, 1997: 115
publication ID |
AF64F35-5144-432F-81C2-D6365C17B6FF |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AF64F35-5144-432F-81C2-D6365C17B6FF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14857632 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03B90601-6300-FFAB-FCCC-1251E4626D03 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath, 1997: 115 |
status |
|
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath, 1997: 115 View in CoL , figs 32–41.
Diagnosis: Body robust and large. Rostrum much broadened on apical half ( Fig. 4D). Subgenital plate shorter than half of pygofer, extended ventrally, without hair-like setae ( Fig. 13A). Style with dense, short and fine setae on dorsal surface ( Fig. 13G). Aedeagal shaft with a pair of short triangular processes subapically; preatrium slightly longer than shaft ( Fig. 13E, F).
Materials examined: One ♂, China, Yunnan Province, Daluo , 679 m, 23 May 2011, coll. Lin Lu ( NWAFU) ; one ♂, Thailand, Phetchabun Khao Kho, NP, mixed deciduous forest near office, 16°39.55′N, 101°8.123′E, 230 m, Pan trap, 7–8 February 2007, coll. Somchai Chachumnan & Saink ( QSBG) GoogleMaps .
Distribution: India and new records for China and Thailand.
Remarks: This species can be distinguished from the other species of Amritodus by the large body, short subgenital plate, and aedeagus with a pair of short triangular processes subapically.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath, 1997: 115
Xue, Qingquan & Zhang, Yalin 2020 |
Amritodus brevis Viraktamath, 1997: 115
Viraktamath CA 1997: 115 |