Synagelides furcatoides, Li & Cheng & Wang & Yang & Peng, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5258.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:723BD7FA-8722-469A-A135-E4E3B6BDD2F7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7777066 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03BD87C5-2B78-5F73-FF12-FAA7FD48FDF0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Synagelides furcatoides |
status |
sp. nov. |
Synagelides furcatoides sp. nov.
Figures 1–14 View FIGURES 1–3 View FIGURES 4–10 View FIGURES 11–14 , 36 View FIGURE 36
Type material. Holotype: ♁, CHINA: Yunnan, Tengchong County, Mangbang Township, Hongdoushu Village , 24.55051°N, 98.35455°E, elevation: 1790 m, 06 June 2006, Chang-Min Yin, Jia-Fang Hu, Ming-Wei Yang and ShaoXian He leg. (HUN-YHY33) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: 8♁ 2♀. CHINA: Yunnan, 1♁, Fugong County, Lumadeng Township, Shibali Village , 500 m radius of guesthouse, 27.16519°N, 98.77891°E, elevation: 2525 m, 1–7 May 2004, Charles Griswold and David Kavanaugh leg. (HUN-CGY24); GoogleMaps 1♁, Fugong County , Lishadi Township , Shibali Village , 27.17746°N, 98.75527°E, elevation: 2820 m, 03 May 2004, Charles Griswold and David Kavanaugh leg. (HUNCGY22) GoogleMaps ; 2♀, Fugong County, Lishadi Township, 0.4 Km SE from Shibali Village , Forest along shelf above Yamu river , 27.16337°N, 98.78208°E, elevation: 2475 m, 05 May 2004, Charles Griswold and David Kavanaugh leg. (HUN-CGY29); GoogleMaps 1♁, Fugong County , Lishadi Township , 0.4 Km SE from Shibali Village , Forest along shelf above Yamu river , 27.16337°N, 98.78208°E, elevation: 2475 m, 08 May 2004, Charles Griswold, David Kavanaugh and Heng-mei Yan leg. (HUN-CGY37); GoogleMaps 3♁, Longyang County , Bawan Township , Nankang Yakou, Understory of Good forest on E-facing slope, 24.83104°N, 98.76864°E, elevation: 2210 m, 23 May 2005, Heng-Mei Yan & Ke-Ji Guo leg. (HUN-GKJ016); GoogleMaps 1♁, Longyang County , Bawan Township , Sancha River , 24.94755°N, 98.75564°E, elevation: 2300 m, 03 June 2005, Heng-Mei Yan, Ke-Ji Guo and Hong-Bin Liang leg. (HUN-GKJ039); GoogleMaps 1♁, Tengchong County , Jietou Township , Datang Village , 25.76778°N, 98.70806°E, elevation: 2430 m, 17 May 2006, Xian-Jin Peng, XinPing Wang and Peng Hu leg. (HUN-Peng060517) GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name is a combination of the Latin “ furcae- ” (fork) and “- oideo ” (seem), referring to the bottom of the palpal bulb being fork-shaped and similar to S. furcatus ; adjective.
Diagnosis. The new species resembles S. hortonensis ( Kanesharatnam & Benjamin, 2020, figs 1A–G, 2A–E, 3A–E) in having slender and weak embolus, strong retrolateral tibial apophysis, and obvious intermediate tibial apophysis ( Kanesharatnam & Benjamin 2020, figs 1D–G, 2A–C), but can be distinguished by: (1) the presence of terminal apophysis, the bulb with two proximal lobes, and the tibia with four apophyses ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1–3 , 11–12 View FIGURES 11–14 ), while the terminal apophysis is absent, the bulb has one proximal lobe, and the tibia has two apophyses in S. hortonensis ( Kanesharatnam & Benjamin 2020, figs 1D–G, 2A–C); (2) the embolus slender in ventral view ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–3 , 11 View FIGURES 11–14 ), while the embolus is broad at the spiral base in S. hortonensis ( Kanesharatnam & Benjamin 2020, figs 1D–E, 2B); (3) the copulatory openings located on the posterior margin of epigynum in ventral view ( Figs 4–5 View FIGURES 4–10 , 13 View FIGURES 11–14 ), while the copulatory openings are located on the median area of epigynum in S. hortonensis ( Kanesharatnam & Benjamin 2020, figs 2D, 3D); (4) the copulatory ducts long and narrow with thin wall ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 4–10 , 14 View FIGURES 11–14 ), while the copulatory ducts are short and stout with thick wall in S. hortonensis ( Kanesharatnam & Benjamin 2020, figs 2E, 3E).
Description. Male ( holotype). Total length 4.52. Carapace 1.86 long, 1.19 wide. Abdomen 2.46 long, 1.49 wide. Clypeus height 0.10. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.38, ALE 0.20, PLE 0.21, AER 0.97, PER 1.05, EFL 0.94. Thoracic groove dark brown, arc-shaped. Cervical and radial grooves obvious. Chelicerae with two promarginal and one retromarginal tooth ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 4–10 ). Leg measurements: I 3.22 (1.06, 0.69, 0.73, 0.74), II 2.41 (0.74, 0.85,0.48, 0.34), III 2.45 (0.66, 0.82, 0.68, 0.29), IV 3.55 (1.02, 1.28, 0.84, 0.41). Leg formula: IV–I–III–II. Tibiae I with four ventral macrosetae while metatarsi I with two pairs of ventral macrosetae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 4–10 ). Abdomen ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4–10 ) long oval, dorsum with five herringbone stripes and a pair of apodemes in the middle, and small diagonal gray stripes on both sides; venter gray, anterior with grayish spots, posterior dark gray with irregular stripes. Spinnerets yellow.
Palp ( Figs 1–3 View FIGURES 1–3 , 11–12 View FIGURES 11–14 ). Crack of palpal bulb extending to lateral edge; distal lobe strong, with a bifurcate tip; bulb with two proximal lobes and the lower one longer; length of retrolateral tibial apophysis 1.5 times as its width; intermediate tibial apophysis wide and short, approximately trapezoidal, with blunt end; ventral tibial apophysis strong, and slightly longer than intermediate tibial apophysis; distal tibial apophysis three times longer than wide; postero-retrolateral cymbial apophysis short, subequal to 1/5 of the length of cymbium; embolus slender, accompanied by membrane; terminal apophysis wide and centrally concaved.
Female ( paratype, HUN-CGY24). Total length 4.42. Carapace 1.72 long, 1.21 wide. Abdomen 2.48 long, 1.59 wide. Clypeus height 0.08. Eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.39, ALE 0.21, PLE 0.20, AER 0.99, PER 1.06, EFL 0.94. Leg measurements: I 3.19 (1.06, 1.46, 0.38, 0.29), II 2.37 (0.78, 0.87, 0.41, 0.31), III 2.54 (0.71, 0.84, 0.68, 0.31), IV 3.72 (0.99, 1.48, 0.91, 0.34). Leg formula: IV–I–III–II. All of the body, markings, and other morphological features same as in male.
Epigynum ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 4–10 , 13–14 View FIGURES 11–14 ). The length of the epigynum about 3/4 of its width; the epigynal hoods located central-posteriorly; two fossae small, occupying 1/13 of the epigynal plate, with distinctly arcuated rims; copulatory openings located posteriorly; the width of the median septum about 1/5 of the epigynal width; copulatory ducts long and hook-shaped, ascending obliquely and then extending transverse, near terminally with short bar-shaped gland ducts; spermathecae with two chambers, anterior chamber of spermathecae pear-shaped, posterior chamber of spermathecae kidney-shaped; junction duct of spermathecae long and narrow.
Distribution. China ( Yunnan Province, Fig. 36 View FIGURE 36 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Salticinae |
Tribe |
Agoriini |
Genus |