Trichothyse ’ africana ( Tucker, 1923 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5583.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77CA9A8E-3717-406E-9B1E-04B1FEDD0D85 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14917227 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C86862-5168-F753-95E1-F9B4FE43FD78 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Trichothyse ’ africana ( Tucker, 1923 ) |
status |
|
‘ Trichothyse ’ africana ( Tucker, 1923) View in CoL
Figs 14, 20 View FIGURES 9–20 , 76–89 View FIGURES 76–83 View FIGURES 84–89
Latonigena africana Tucker, 1923: 383 , plate XI, fig. 83 (holotype ♀: SOUTH AFRICA: Western Cape: Ceres [33°24’S, 19°17’E], I.1917, leg. R.W. Tucker, SAMC B3448—not examined).
‘ Latonigena View in CoL ’ africanus Murphy, 2007: 52, figs 358–359.
Trichothyse africana Ott et al., 2012: 238 View in CoL ; Lissner & Chatzaki, 2016: 17, figs 2D, 4F; Dippenaar-Schoeman et al., 2021: 27, figs 1–4.
Material examined. SOUTH AFRICA: Free State: Fouriesburg district, Wyndford Guest Farm, 28°41’17’’S, 28°13’44’’E, 1826 m a.s.l., 7.VI.2014, leg. P. Webb (hand collecting), 1♂ ( NCA 2016 /1194); Wepener district GoogleMaps , Farm Dereham, 29°52’45’’S, 27°04’47’’E, 1515 m a.s.l., 2.I.2021, leg. C. Haddad (in grass tussocks, grazed grassland), 1♀ ( NCA 2021 /1602). Northern Cape: Rooipoort Nature Reserve GoogleMaps , 28°40’40’’S, 24°18’14’’E, 18–23.III.2013, leg. R. Lyle, P. Lyle, P. Webb & M. Stiller (night collecting), 1♀ ( NCA 2016 /1210).
Remarks. A widespread species recorded from seven of the nine South African provinces, as well as Mozambique ( Dippenaar-Schoeman et al. 2021), T. africana was originally described from the Matroosberg Mountains near Ceres in the Western Cape ( Tucker 1923). The relationships of the species remain obscure as the male has not yet been described, although we provide images of it ( Figs 76–83 View FIGURES 76–83 ). Even though the species shares a variety of characters with other members of Trichothyse , including a male dorsal abdominal scutum ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 76–83 ), the scopulated anterior parts of metatarsi and tarsi ( Figs 80 View FIGURES 76–83 , 88 View FIGURES 84–89 ), and females with a keel on the cheliceral promargin ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 84–89 ), males differ in several respects: 1) cheliceral promargin with distinct teeth and not a keel ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 76–83 ); 2) absence of a curved distal membranous conductor ( Figs 82–83 View FIGURES 76–83 ); 3) palp with a simple RTA without an additional protuberance on its dorsal surface ( Figs 82–83 View FIGURES 76–83 ); 4) clearly different embolus shape, with sharp and angular sclerotisations terminating apically ( Figs 82–83 View FIGURES 76–83 ); 5) presence of a distinct hooked median apophysis, positioned close to the embolus ( Figs 82–83 View FIGURES 76–83 ); 6) lack of a tooth on the cheliceral retromargin in females ( Fig. 87 View FIGURES 84–89 ), although present in males ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 76–83 ); 7) narrow sperm duct in the male palp ( Figs 82–83 View FIGURES 76–83 ); and 8) habitus of yellow-brown colouration ( Figs 76 View FIGURES 76–83 , 84 View FIGURES 84–89 ).
Considering the groupings proposed by Murphy (2007), T. africana clearly belongs to the “ Echemus group” of genera, but its affinities and possible placement remain unclear. If it represents a new genus, such a description would wait pending further taxonomic investigation, including related undescribed species, and stronger support, including molecular data.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Herpyllinae |
Genus |
Trichothyse ’ africana ( Tucker, 1923 )
Sankaran, Pradeep M., Haddad, Charles R. & Tripathi, Rishikesh 2025 |
Latonigena africana
Tucker, R. W. E. 1923: 383 |