Epeirotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1010.3021 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:90524F49-7BA2-4B8A-9BE3-450CB77A31A0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17151284 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03C987C4-B575-8C7F-FDD4-FEDCFE01FE22 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Epeirotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 |
status |
|
Epeirotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 View in CoL
Epeirotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894: 134 View in CoL .
Type species Epeirotypus brevipes O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894 View in CoL .
Diagnosis
Males of Epeirotypus can be distinguished from those of other theridiosomatid genera by the long, bulky embolus distally acute ( Figs 14E View Fig , 16E View Fig , 18E View Fig ; see also Coddington 1986) (in contrast with entire, thin laminated, or distally lobed embolus in the other genera). Females of Epeirotypus can be distinguished from those of other genera by the domed (i.e., elevated ventrally) epigynal plate ( Miller et al. 2009: fig. 3b) (absent in other genera except for Naatlo ), a vulval bifid sclerotized septum (i.e., see BS in figures) formed by posterior projections extending behind the spermathecae and fusing along the midline (absent in other genera), and the distal section of the copulatory ducts heavily sclerotized in connection with the spermathecae ( Figs 5D View Fig , 15C–D View Fig , 17C–D View Fig , 19C–D View Fig , 20C–D View Fig , 21C–D View Fig , 22C–D View Fig , 23C–D View Fig ; see also Coddington 1986) (in contrast with irregular and membranous or completely sclerotized copulatory ducts).
Description
Females of Epeirotypus have massive proximal copulatory ducts (i.e., more than three times diameter of distal region of copulatory ducts) with dorsal patches of gland ducts, and distal copulatory ducts heavily sclerotized (i.e., dark) inserting dorsolaterally posteriorly into spermathecae ( Figs 5D–E View Fig , 15D View Fig , 17D View Fig , 19D View Fig , 20D View Fig , 21D View Fig , 22D View Fig , 23D View Fig ). For further genus description details, see Coddington (1986) and Labarque & Griswold (2014).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Epeirotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894
Labarque, Facundo M., Piacentini, Luis N., Pons, Joan, Hormiga, Gustavo, Arnedo, Miquel A. & Ramírez, Martín J. 2025 |
Epeirotypus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1894: 134
Pickard-Cambridge O. 1894: 134 |