Chamalycaeus logtakensis (Godwin-Austen, 1914)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1029.3131 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF18E518-A00B-4411-A87C-EC96CF1C3CE7 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC1E69-A33D-FFC1-BAD7-F997B556FBFC |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Chamalycaeus logtakensis (Godwin-Austen, 1914) |
| status |
|
Chamalycaeus logtakensis (Godwin-Austen, 1914)
Fig. 8
Alycaeus logtakensis Godwin-Austen, 1914: 394–395 View in CoL , pl. 155 fig. 6.
Alycaeus tanghali Godwin-Austen, 1914: 401 View in CoL , pl. 137 figs 3, 3a–b. Syn. nov.
Alycaeus logtakensis View in CoL – Gude 1921: 209–210.
Alycaeus ( Alycaeus) logtakensis View in CoL – Ramakrishna et al. 2010: 48.
Dicharax (?) logtakensis View in CoL – Páll-Gergely et al. 2020: 94 View Cited Treatment .
Chamalycaeus tanghali View in CoL – Páll-Gergely et al. 2020: 46 View Cited Treatment .
Diagnosis
The low R3 without conspicuous swelling distinguishes this species from all congeners of this species group.
Type material examined
INDIA • 1 syntype of A. logtakensis ( Fig. 8A–E); on a low hill, Logtak Lake , Munipur; Godwin-Austen coll.; “figured”; NHMUK 1903.7 About NHMUK .1.2639 • 6 syntypes of A. tanghali ; Munipur; figured by Godwin-Austen; NHMUK 1903.7 About NHMUK .1.2671 ( Fig. 8F–J) .
Type localities
“Logtak Lake, Munipur (No. 2639 B.M. Coll.), on a low hill near the northern shore” ( A. logtakensis ); “Munipur. Exact locality not recorded; somewhere on the northern side of the valley” ( A. tanghali ).
Differential diagnosis
The most similar species is C. sculpturus , but that species has a less fringed aperture and a more rounded body whorl.
Remarks
There are no conchological differences between A. logtakensis and A. tanghali , and they are both from central Manipur State. Their descriptions were published in the same work but A. tanghali appeared a few pages later, therefore A. logtakensis is chosen to be the valid name. Godwin-Austen (1914) compared A. tanghali only with A. sculptilis .
Alycaeus logtakensis was included in the genus Dicharax because no spiral striation was observed on the corroded syntype ( Páll-Gergely et al. 2020). However, re-examination of the syntype of A. logtakensis revealed spiral striation on the teleoconch. Chamalycaeus tanghali was already classified in Chamalycaeus due to spiral striation on the teleoconch.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Chamalycaeus logtakensis (Godwin-Austen, 1914)
| Páll-Gergely, Barna, Gojšina, Vukašin & Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram 2025 |
Dicharax (?) logtakensis
| Pall-Gergely B. & Sajan S. & Tripathy B. & Meng K. & Asami T. & Ablett J. D. 2020: 94 |
Chamalycaeus tanghali
| Pall-Gergely B. & Sajan S. & Tripathy B. & Meng K. & Asami T. & Ablett J. D. 2020: 46 |
Alycaeus ( Alycaeus ) logtakensis
| Ramakrishna & Mitra S. C. & Dey A. 2010: 48 |
Alycaeus logtakensis
| Gude G. K. 1921: 209 |
