Dicharax dohertyi ( Godwin-Austen, 1893 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1029.3131 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CF18E518-A00B-4411-A87C-EC96CF1C3CE7 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CC1E69-A3B8-FF5A-B926-FC9CB281FA4D |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Dicharax dohertyi ( Godwin-Austen, 1893 ) |
| status |
|
Dicharax dohertyi ( Godwin-Austen, 1893) View in CoL
Fig. 81K–L
Alycaeus dohertyi Godwin-Austen, 1893: 595 View in CoL .
Alycaeus dohertyi View in CoL – Godwin-Austen 1897: 3, pl. 63 figs 3, 3a. — Godwin-Austen 1914: 408.
Alycaeus ( Dicharax) dohertyi View in CoL – Kobelt 1902: 369. — Gude 1921: 248–249.
Dicharax (?) dohertyi View in CoL – Páll-Gergely et al. 2020: 85 View Cited Treatment .
Material examined
The type specimens of this species are probably lost ( Páll-Gergely et al. 2020).
Type locality
“Momeit, Burmah”.
Differential diagnosis
According to the drawings ( Fig. 81K–L), the most similar species is probably D. rugosus , but in that species only the inner surface of the peristome is fringed. See also under D. muspratti .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Dicharax dohertyi ( Godwin-Austen, 1893 )
| Páll-Gergely, Barna, Gojšina, Vukašin & Aravind, Neelavar Ananthram 2025 |
Dicharax (?) dohertyi
| Pall-Gergely B. & Sajan S. & Tripathy B. & Meng K. & Asami T. & Ablett J. D. 2020: 85 |
Alycaeus ( Dicharax ) dohertyi
| Gude G. K. 1921: 248 |
| Kobelt W. 1902: 369 |
Alycaeus dohertyi
| Godwin-Austen H. H. 1893: 595 |
