Filograninae Rioja, 1923 sensu Kupriyanova et al., 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3853/j.2201-4349.76.2024.1901 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14669109 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF5E32-FF8C-5379-5F9E-4E11FC10FE7D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Filograninae Rioja, 1923 sensu Kupriyanova et al., 2023 |
status |
|
Subfamily Filograninae Rioja, 1923 sensu Kupriyanova et al., 2023
Subfamily diagnosis. Tube not spirally coiled; body symmetrical; thoracic sickle ( Apomatus ) chaetae present; abdominal chaetae flat geniculate.
Remarks. The subfamily Filograninae was proposed by Rioja (1923: 107) who stated that presence of pinnules on the opercular peduncle “indicates that the species included in this subfamily are very primitive, …, corroborated by a hardly developed operculum”. However, molecular phylogenetic studies (e.g., Kupriyanova et al., 2006; Lehrke et al., 2007; Kupriyanova et al., 2023) found that both traditional subfamilies Serpulinae and Filograninae were not monophyletic, so Kupriyanova et al. (2023) re-classified and re-formulated the sub-family diagnoses and based these on chaetal structures.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.