Telistosega, Lucena & Melo, 2025

Lucena, Daercio A. A. & Melo, Gabriel A. R., 2025, Expanding the Amiseginae: remarkable new Cretaceous-age fossils shed light on the early diversification of a highly specialized clade of cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 204 (2) : -

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaf054

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5F2E74E-DBBE-4D1D-A8DC-55B8344C728C

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D187CA-707D-B86A-FC74-FD06FC2D6598

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Telistosega
status

gen. nov.

Genus † Telistosega gen. nov.

ZooBank registration: LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:

Type species: † Telistosega intermedia sp. nov.

Diagnosis

Head not pyriform, somewhat flattened frontally; maxillary palpomeres with four articles; malar space short, ~0.2 × eye height, without longitudinal sulcus; scape length 4.6 × maximum width; flagellum fusiform, with intermediate articles broader than long; mandible with distinctly expanded basal area on outer surface, becoming strongly thin and tapering apically, main axis straight, slightly bent submedially, lacking subapical teeth on laminar edge; pronotum strongly declivitous anteriorly, posterior margin nearly straight, distinctly swollen and without transverse posterior groove, posterolateral lobe reaching tegula, lacking posterolateral and posteromedial pits; mesopleuron evenly convex, without transverse scrobal sulcus, anterior border lacking carina; dorsum of propodeum very short, shelf-like, posteriorly delimited by transverse carina, disc raised; posterior propodeal projection short, bluntly angulate; tarsal claw with very short, perpendicular, submedial tooth; metasoma with four exposed terga, internalized segments partly exposed, composing a relatively long and robust distal tube (comparatively with other Amiseginae ).

Description

Head: Not pyriform, somewhat flattened frontally, wider than high; frons lacking medial longitudinal groove; eye bulging, occupying much of lateral head, upper limit surpassing dorsal margin of lateral ocellus, inner margin gently converging at ocellar area; maxillary palpomeres with four countable articles; malar space ~0.2 × eye height, longitudinal groove indistinct, apparently absent; ocelli inserted smoothly, without well-marked small sulci around them; occipital carina short, extended only dorsally; scapal basin shallowly excavated, disc smooth, borders smoothly round, without carina or sharp edges; scape length 4.6 × maximum width; flagellum fusiform, with intermediate articles broader than long, F1 longer than combined length of F2 + F3; mandible with distinctly expanded basal area on outer surface, becoming strongly thin and tapering apically, main axis straight, slightly bent submedially, lacking subapical teeth on laminar edge.

Mesosoma: Evenly convex, not flattened dorsally, somewhat shortened anteroposteriorly; pronotum about as long as scutum in mid-line, strongly declivitous anteriorly, crossed transversely by anterior groove, posterior margin nearly straight, distinctly swollen and without transverse groove, posterolateral lobe reaching tegula, lacking posterolateral and posteromedial pits; notaulus deeply impressed, parallel-sided posteriorly, parapsidal line well marked posteriorly; scutellum slightly longer than half length of scutum in mid-line, evenly convex, simple; mesopleuron evenly convex, without transverse scrobal sulcus, anterior border lacking carina; metanotum shorter than one-third of scutellum in mid-line, expanded and slightly depressed laterally, disc slightly raised; metapleural carina distinguishable, extending across laterodorsal propodeal surface; propodeum with distinguishable lateral, dorsal, and posterior surfaces; dorsum short, shelf-like, posteriorly delimited by transverse carina, disc raised; posterior propodeal projection short, bluntly angulate; posterior declivity strongly declivitous, apparently crossed by longitudinal medial carina; tarsal claw with very short, perpendicular, submedial tooth; costal cell narrow, first abscissa of M diverging before 1cu-a, gently and smoothly curved submedially; Rs+M arising apically on M; medial cell indicated only by spectral veins; R1 shorter than stigma; Rs short, smoothly curved, distal trace fading gradually towards costal margin.

Metasoma: Four exposed terga, internalized segments partly exposed, composing a relatively long and robust distal tube (comparatively with other Amiseginae ); sterna convex and undivided medially.

Male: Unknown.

Etymology

The name is derived from the Greek telistos, meaning ‘farthest’,

plus ‘-sega’ from Amisega Cameron. The name is feminine.

Telistosega intermedia sp. nov.

( Fig. 9)

ZooBank registration: LSID: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:

Description

Holotype female ( DZUP Bur-728a). Body length, ~ 2.8 mm.

Head: LID wide, subequal to eye width; gena narrow, slightly wider basally; lateral ocelli closer to inner eye margin and median ocellus than to each other; inner margin of antennal sockets touching; F4–F10 progressively shortened, F4–F11 with ventral flattened areas, F11 gently acuminate; clypeus with distinctly elongated, erect, thin, gold setation; eye glabrous; dorsum of head finely and densely punctate.

Mesosoma: Lateral pronotal depression shallowly excavated; metabasitarsus without two rows of spines; dorsum of metafemur evenly convex, without anterior expansion; dorsal sclerites of mesosoma finely and densely punctate; short, sparse, suberect setation on dorsum, becoming longer and denser posterolaterally on propodeum; wing membrane entirely setose.

Metasoma: Lateral terga broadly round, without carinae delimiting the lateral fold.

Male: Unknown.

Etymology

The species name is a Latin adjective meaning ‘intermediate’.

Type material

Holotype female in amber piece DZUP Bur-728a. The specimen is intact and well preserved. Some cracks in the amber piece prevent the lateral left view of the specimen.

Remarks

Telistosega most resembles † Miracorium (the first female of this genus is described above), based on the general shape and structure of pronotum, frons not bulging, dorsum of propodeum short, shelf-like, posterior propodeal projection short, bluntly angulate, metabasitarsus lacking two rows of spines, and tarsal claw with small, perpendicular, submedial tooth. The new genus is readily distinguished from † Miracorium based on the narrow costal cell (distinctly broad in † Miracorium ; for comparison of this feature, see Fig. 7A, C; see also Lucena and Melo 2018: their fig.3; Lucena and Almeida 2022: their figs 15 and S22, S23); head wider than high, with broad face (pyriform in † Miracorium ); occipital carina extended dorsally (lacking in † Miracorium ); and short and simple malar space (moderately long and longitudinally crossed by sulcus in † Miracorium ). Additionally, the modified pronotum, strongly declivitous anteriorly and with swollen posterior border, combined with the above-mentioned character states, readily distinguish † Telistosega from all other genera of Amiseginae View in CoL s.l.

DZUP

Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Chrysididae

Loc

Telistosega

Lucena, Daercio A. A. & Melo, Gabriel A. R. 2025
2025
Loc

Telistosega

Lucena & Melo 2025
2025
Loc

Telistosega

Lucena & Melo 2025
2025
Loc

Miracorium

Lucena & Melo 2018
2018
Loc

Miracorium

Lucena & Melo 2018
2018
Loc

Miracorium

Lucena & Melo 2018
2018
Loc

Miracorium

Lucena & Melo 2018
2018
Loc

Miracorium

Lucena & Melo 2018
2018
Loc

Miracorium

Lucena & Melo 2018
2018
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF