Acronicta major ( Bremer, 1861 )

Sohn, Jae-Cheon, Tzuoo, Han-Rong & Cho, Soowon, 2024, Two in one: DNA taxonomy of Acronicta major complex (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reveals previous misidentifications and faunal connection in East Asia, Ecologica Montenegrina 79, pp. 76-86 : 81-86

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.37828/em.2024.79.7

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D4DF29-217D-FF8B-8CD9-F8EA8B619EDE

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Acronicta major ( Bremer, 1861 )
status

 

Acronicta major ( Bremer, 1861) View in CoL

( Figs 1–4 View Figures 1–8 , 9–16 View Figures 9–23 , 24–25 View Figures 24–27 , 28–29 View Figures 28–31 )

Acronycta major Bremer, 1861: 484 View in CoL . Type locality: Russia, “Ussuri Ema” [= Primorye terr.].

Triaena anaedina Butler, 1881: 19 View in CoL . Type locality: Japan, Tokyo.

Acronicta major View in CoL ab. defigurata Warren, 1910: 15. Type locality: unknown.

Acronicta major ssp. atritaigena Dubatolov & Zolotarenko, [1996] : 34, fig. 1b. Type locality: Russia, South Siberia , Altai.

Redescription. This species is very similar to the former species on overall features but they can be distinguished from each other in the external and genital features as shown in Table 2.

Material examined. KOREA [Gangwon] 1♀, Gangreung-si, Yeongok-myeon, Odaesan Resting Place (N37°49′58.4″ E128°39′02.7″, alt. 283 m), 4 viii 2004 ( SW Cho, JC Sohn & HJ Park), CBNU GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Korea, Gangwon Prov., Taebaeg-si, Hwabangjae (N37°06′52″ E128°54′41″, alt. 953 m), 30 vii 2002 ( DP Lyu, HJ Park & SC Nam), CBNU GoogleMaps . [Seoul] 2♂, Seoul-si, Seongbug-gu, Korea University (in campus), 19 v 1961 ( YB Yoo), GJUE ; 1♂, ditto, 27 v 1961 ( YB Yoo), GJUE . [Gyonggi] 1♂, Cheongpyeong , 13 viii 1972 ( SM Lee), GJUE ; 1♂, Hwanseong-si, Gijeon-ri , 15 vi 1996 ( JC Yun), GJUE ; 1♂, Pyeongteg , 9 vi 1974, GJUE ; 1♂, Suwon , 9 vi 1976 ( JC Paik), GJUE ; 1♂, ditto, 23 vi 1976 ( JC Paik), GJUE ; 1♀, Yeoncheon , 10 ix 1991, GJUE . [Chungbug] 1♂, Goesan , 11–15 ix 1991, GJUE ; 1♂, Jecheon-si, Hansu-myeon, Songgye-li , Mt. Weolagsan (N35°51′56.0″ E128°05′20.0″, alt. 222 m), 18 vi 2004 (S Cho, S Nam & Y Han), CBNU GoogleMaps . [Chungnam] 1♂ 2♀, Gongju-si, Mt. Gyeryongsan, Templ. Donghagsa , 28 vii 1979, GJUE ; 1♀, Gongju-si, Mt. Gyeryongsan, Templ. Gapsa , 29 vii 1979, [GSN] SJC-705, GJUE . [Jeonbug] 1♂, Muju-gun, Mupung-myeon, Samgeo-ri (N35°52′02.0″ E127°49′42.2″, alt. 933 m), 27 vii 2003 ( SW Cho, SC Nam & DB Kwon), CBNU GoogleMaps . [Jeonnam] 3♂ 1♀, Gulye-gun, Sandong-myeon, Mt. Jirisan , Nogodan Cabin (N35°17′35.4″ E127°31′41.1″, alt. 1,344 m), 20 vii 2004 (S Cho, JC Sohn & HJ Park), [GSN] SJC-752(♂), [DNA] JCS-COI-D-314, CBNU GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Suncheon-si, Mt. Chogyesan , 2 viii 1994 ( SB Ahn), [GSN] SJC-756, GJUE . [Gyeongbug] 2♂, Ulleung-gun, Is. Ulleungdo, Ulleung-eup , Jeodong-ri , Naesujeon trail (N37°31′01.0″ E130°54′18.6″, alt. 340 m), 28 v 2017, JCS-COI 17-010, CBNU GoogleMaps ; 1♀, Yeongdeok , 26–30 ix 1991, GJUE . [Gyeongnam] 1♂, Geoje-si, Jangmog-myeon, Jangmog-ri , Jangmunpo Waeseong (N34°59′30.8″ E128°40′25.2″), 23 viii 2004 ( SW Cho, JC Sohn & SC Nam), CBNU GoogleMaps ; 1♂, Haman-gun, Chilgog-myeon , 6 ix 2002 ( JK Kim), [GSN] SJC-237, GJUE ; 1♂, Ulsan-si, Eonyang, Mt. Gajisan , Baenaegol (valley), 28 vi 2000 ( JY Choi ), NIAST . [Jeju] 3♂, Is. Jejudo, Seogwipo-si, Beobjeongag (N33°19′22.2″ E126°28′02.6″, alt. 895 m), 1 viii 2003 (S Cho et al.), [GSN] SJC-754, JCS-COI 17-003, CBNU GoogleMaps . CHINA [Jilin] 1♂, Chongshan, Mt. Changbaishan (alt. 720 m), 3 viii 2002 (Park, Han & Kim), [GSN] SJC-762, GJUE .

Distribution. Korea, Japan, China, Russia (Far East, South Siberia).

Host plants. Polyphagous: Fabaceae Robinia spp. ; Moraceae Morus spp. ; Rosaceae Malus spp. , Prunus spp. , Pyrus spp. ; Salicaceae Salix spp. ; Sapindaceae Acer spp. ; Ulmaceae Zelkova spp. ( Yamamoto & Sugi 1987; Lee & Chung 1997).

Remarks. The specimens of A. major from two remote islands of Korea, Jejudo and Ulleungdo exhibit the paler wings than the inland ones ( Figs 3–4 View Figures 1–8 ). This species has been treated as a pest on cultivated mulberries ( Lim et al. 2017). The status needs to be reconsidered, since the larvae of A. gigasa also feed on the plants.

2. COI divergences

Our NJ tree of 13 COI barcodes against an outgroup, Acronicta rumicis showed their division into two clades, corresponding to A. major and A. gigasa ( Fig. 32 View Figure 32 ). The average infraspecific divergences of A. major clade and A. gigasa clade were 1.07 and 0.08% in K2P and 1.13 and 0.08% in p -distance, respectively. The average interspecific COI divergence of those two species was 6.22% in K2P and 6.17% in p -distance ( Table 3). The A. major clade was divided into two subclades (“A” and “B” in Fig. 32 View Figure 32 ). The subclade A exhibited 0.51% of average COI divergence (0.52% in p -distance) among the included individuals from two remote islands, Jejudo and Ulleungdo, Russia and an unknown locality of Korea. The subclade B comprised one individual from Mt. Jirisan of Korea and two from China and their average COI divergence was 0.43% in K2P and 0.47% in p -distance. The average COI divergence between two subclades of A. major was 2.35% in K2P and 2.39% in p -distance ( Table 3).

Discussion

The Larger Dagger moth, Acronicta major occurs broadly in the temperate East Asia including Korea ( Kononenko et al. 1998). It is considered as a common species flying in June and July across South Korea ( Kim et al. 1982). The larvae occasionally cause minor damage on colonnades and trees of economic importance in the country ( Lee & Chung 1997; Moon & Lee 2014; Lim et al. 2017; Ahn et al. 2022). Our study on the Korean populations of hitherto known “ A. major ” revealed that they are in fact mixed with another species, A. gigasa . This necessitates a reconsideration of their distribution and bionomics in Korea. To make the situation complicate, those two species in some localities occur sympatrically and also share mulberries as larval hosts. They exhibit clear differences in the genital features, while their superficial appearance is nearly indistinguishable. The black streak on the basal area of the forewing is narrower and shorter in A. gigasa than in A. major . These differences, however, become obscure in some specimens. Therefore, reliable identification of those two species needs examination of their genitalia.

Our NJ clustering of COI barcodes included eight and five accounts of A. major and A. gigasa , respectively. The resulting tree showed the less divergence among the Korean and Taiwanese specimens of A. gigasa than those among the specimens of A. major from various localities. The local populations of A. major were divided into two subclades possibly representing subspecies. There have been two subspecies of A. major, ssp. major and atritaigena, known from Russia. The individuals of A. major from Islands Jejudo and Ulleungdo appears similar to ssp. atritaigena in the external features. On the other hand, Han & Kononenko (2010) disputed the subspecies status of atritaigena. In fact, the subspecific division of A. major needs examination of the local populations broadly sampled across East Asia. The taxonomic status of two subclades of A. major found from the present study is pending, until such examination becomes available.

The trivial COI divergences between the populations of A. gigasa from Korea and Taiwan may imply their separation relatively recent. The extant biota of Taiwan originated from Asian continent or its surrounding islands ( Ali 2017). In fact, the island has been periodically connected with Asian mainland through a land bridge ( Qu et al. 2015). Jowers et al. (2019) proposed that the dispersal of some mammals involved in the land bridge. In such cases, the Ryukyu Islands arc system played a pivotal role, leading to the similarity in the biotas of Japan, Chinese mainland and Taiwan. A faunistic belt linking Korea, Taiwan and southern China, and excluding Japan, has gained less attention. The distribution of A. gigasa may provide an example of such belt. A bombycid, Rotunda rotundapex ( Miyata & Kishida, 1990) seems another example ( Wang et al. 2015). The distributional pattern can be better explained by vicariance along fragmentation processes of East Asian margins during Quaternary glacial cycling. Such geological events seem of particular interest but remain unstudied. Furthermore, an Indochinese species, A. meghala exhibits closer affinity to A. major than to A. gigasa in the genital features. The phylogenetic relationships of the East Asian members of A. major species-group may help in understanding their current distributions but such information is still on demand.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Biological Resources (NIBR), funded by the Ministry of Environment (MOE) of the Republic of Korea (NIBR202203201).

References

Ahn, S., Lee, S., Kim, J., Nam, Y., Choi, S. & Jung, J.-K. (2022) Occurrence of lepidopteran insects in urban forests. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 61, 481–496.

Ali, J.R. (2017). Islands as biological substrates: Classification of the biological assemblage components and the physical island types. Journal of Biogeography, 44, 984–994.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12872

Bereś, P.K. (2009) Knot grass (Acronicta rumicis L.) – a new maize pest in southeastern Poland. Progress in Plant Protection, 49, 82–85.

Bremer, O. (1861) Neue Lepidopteren aus Ost-Sibirien und en Amur-lande, gesammelt von Radde un Maack. Bulletin de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbroug, 3, 462–496.

Butler, A.G. (1881) Descriptions of new genera and species of Heterocerous Lepidoptera from Japan. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London, 1881, 1–23.

Chang, B.C. (1991) Illustration of Moths in Taiwan. Taiwan Museum Series 5. Taiwan Museum, Taipei, 366 pp. [in Chinese]

Clarke, J.F.G. (1941) The preparation of slides of the genitalia of Lepidoptera. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society, 36, 149–161.

Dar, M.A., Akbar, S.A. & Khan, Z.H. (2019) Acronicta rumicis (Linnaeus, 1758), emerging pest of apple plantation in Kashmir Valley. National Academy Science Letters, 42, 287–289.

Dubatolov, V.V. & Zolotarenko, G.S. (1996) New taxa of Acronictinae (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) from the mountains of South Siberia. Actias, 2, 33–36.

Fibiger, M., Ronkay, L., Steiner, A. & Zilli, A. (2009) Noctuidae Europaea, 11. Pantheinae, Dilobinae, Acronicitinae, Nolinae, Eustrotiinae, Acontiinae, Metoponiinae, Heliothinae and Bryophilinae. Entomological Press, Sorø, 504 pp.

Fiumi, G. & Govi, G. (2022) A new species of Acronicta Ochsenheimer, 1816 from Corsica: Acronicta elsae n. sp. (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Noctuidae: Acronictinae). Quaderno di Studi e Notizie di Storia Naturale della Romagna, 55, 227–240.

Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R. & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994) DNA primers for amplication of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294–299.

Grote, A.R. (1896) Mittheilungen aus dem Roemer-Museum, Hildesheim, number 3, Die Apateliden. Das Museum, Göttingen, 18 pp.

Jowers, M.J., Sánchez-Ramírez, S., Song, E., Angelone, S., Choi, T., Voloshina, I. & Woo, D. (2019) Biogeography of Korea’s top predator, the yellow- throated Marten: evolutionary history and population dynamics. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 19, 23.

Han, H.L. & Kononenko, V.S. (2010) New species of the genera Acronicta Ochsenheimer, 1816 and Craniophora Snellen, 1867 from China with notes on synonymy and checklist (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae: Acronictinae). Zootaxa, 2678, 48–68. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2678.1.2

Holloway, J.D. (1989) The Moths of Borneo: Family Noctuidae, trifinae subfamilies: Noctuinae, Heliothinae, Hadeninae, Acronictinae, Amphipirynae, Agaristinae. Malayan nature Journal, 42, 57–288.

Kearse, M., Moir, R., Wilson, A., Stones-Havas, S., Cheung, M., Sturrock, S., Buxton, S., Cooper, A., Markowitz, S., Duran, C., Thierer, T., Ashton, B., Mentjies, P. & Drummond, A. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinfomatics, 28, 1647–1649.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199

Kim, C.-H., Nam, S.-H. & Lee, S.-M. (1982) Illustrated Flora & Fauna of Korea, Vol. 26 Insecta (VIII). Ministry of Education, Seoul, 919 pp. [in Korean]

Klots, A.B. (1970) Lepidoptera. In: Tuxen, S.L. (Ed.), Taxonomist’s Glossary of Genitalia in Insects. Munksgaard, Copenhagen, pp. 115–130.

Kononenko, V.S., Ahn, S.B. & Ronkay, L. (1998) Illustrated Catalogue of Noctuidae in Korea (Lepidoptera). Insects of Korea Series 3. Junghaeng-sa, Seoul, 507 pp.

Kononenko, V.S. & Han, H.L. (2008) Two new Acronicta Ochsenheimer, 1816 from China and Russia (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Acronictinae). Zootaxa, 1910, 45–52.

Kozhantschikov, I.V. (1950) Fauna SSSR. Vol. 12, Family Orgiidae [Insecta, Lepidoptera]. Nasekomye Cheshuekrylye. Leningrad, 581 pp. [in Russian]

Lee, B.-Y. & Chung, Y.-J. (1997) Insect Pests of Trees and Shrubs in Korea. Seong An Dang Publishing Co., Seoul, 459 pp. [in Korean]

Lim, J.-R., Moon, H.-C., Kim, D.-W., Kwon, S.-J., Han, S.-G. & Kwak, D.-O. (2017) Occurrences of insect pests on fruit-producing mulberry plants in Jeonbuk Province. Korean Journal of Applied Entomology, 56, 203–212.

Merzheevskaya, O.I. (1967) Gusenitsy Sovok (Noctuidae), ikh Biologiya i Morfologiya (Opredelitel’). Akademiya Nauk Belorusskoi SSR, Minsk. [in Russian]

Miyata, T. & Kishida, Y. (1990) Description of a new species of the genus Bombyx Linnaeus (Bombycidae) from Taiwan. Japan Heterocerists' Journal, 158, 142–143.

Moon, S.-C. & Lee, S.-G. (2014) Diseases and Insect Pests of Woody Plants. Checklist of Organisms in Korea 10. Econature Publishing, Seoul, 871 pp. [in Korean]

Qu, Y., Song, G., Gao, B., Quan, Q., Ericson, P. G. P., & Lei, F. (2015). The influence of geological events on the endemism of East Asian birds studied through comparative phylogeography. Journal of Biogeography, 42, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12407

Ride, W.D.I., Cogger, H.G., Dupuis, C., Klaus, O., Minelli, A. & Thompson, F.C. (2000) International Code of Zoological Nimenclature, Fourth Edition. Tipografia La Garangola, Padova, Italy.

Schmidt, C. (2023) Family Noctuidae Latreille, 1809 (owlet moths and allies). In: Pohl, G.R. & Nanz, S.R. (Eds.), Annotated Taxonomic Checklist of the Lepidoptera of North America, North of Mexico. The Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Bakersfield, California, pp. 368–424.

Sohn, J.-C., Kim, S.-S., Koo, J.-M. & Choi, S.-W. (2021) Review of Cotachena Moore, 1885 (Lepidoptera: Crambidae, Spilomelinae) from Korea based on morphology and DNA barcodes. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 24, 383–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2021.01.011

Strand, E. (1916) Neue Aberrationen der Noctuiden-Subfamilie Acronyctinae. Archiv für Naturgeschichte, 81 A, 150–165.

Sugi, S. (1979) A new species of Acronicta from Japan with notes on subgenera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Tinea, 10, 245–251.

Wang, X., Wang, M., Zolotuhin, V.V., Hirowatari, T., Wu, S. & Huang, G.-H. (2015) The fauna of the family Bombycidae sensu lato (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Bombycoidea) from Mainland China, Taiwan and Hainan Islands. Zootaxa, 3989, 1–138.

Warren, W. (1907 –1914) Acronicta. In: Seitz, A. (Ed.), Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde. Die Gross-Schmetterlinge des Palaearctischen Faungebietes. Band 3. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, pp. 13–16.

Yamamoto, M. & Sugi, S. (1987) Noctuidae excluding Herminiinae. In: Sugi, S. (Ed.), Larvae of Larger Moths in Japan. Kodansha, Tokyo, pp. 185–239.

SM

Sarawak Museum

SB

Saint Bernard Abbey

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Noctuidae

Genus

Acronicta

Loc

Acronicta major ( Bremer, 1861 )

Sohn, Jae-Cheon, Tzuoo, Han-Rong & Cho, Soowon 2024
2024
Loc

Triaena anaedina

Butler, A. G. 1881: 19
1881
Loc

Acronycta major

Bremer, O. 1861: 484
1861
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF