Cyphochilus satyarthii Sabatinelli, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5693.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:16A01C84-EC8B-46C0-9EDE-979CF6CE5822 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17322232 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD1656-DA14-FFE1-ABB7-B32E8AB1F692 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyphochilus satyarthii Sabatinelli, 2020 |
status |
|
Cyphochilus satyarthii Sabatinelli, 2020 View in CoL
( Figs 20–21 View FIGURES 20–21 )
Type locality: Sikkim .
Type material examined. Holotype ♂ MHNG: Himalaja [sic] / Sikkim // (ENTO-81689) . Paratypes: 1 ♂ ISNB: Sikkim / ex coll. Ley — 1 ♂ PCMN: India, Sikkim east, Gangtok , env. / 2000–2500m, Fambong-Lo forest / 8–15.VII.1997 / Jan Schneider lgt .— 1 ♂ MNHN: Pedong [Kalimpong] / A. Desgodins / ex coll. R. Oberthur.
Diagnosis: Parameres slightly asymmetrical, both curved dorsally; the right paramere bears a distinct spur on the outer margin of its distal third ( Fig. 20A–C View FIGURES 20–21 ).
Distribution: India: Sikkim, West Bengal ( Sabatinelli 2020b).
Remarks: Cyphochilus satyarthii , C. candidus , C. septentrionalis , C. gandhii , and C. tenzingyatsoi occur in northeastern India.These species are externally very similar, which has historically led to frequent misidentifications. Cyphochilus satyarthii can be reliably distinguished by the morphology of its parameres: the left paramere is unarmed, whereas the right paramere bears an externally directed spur.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.