Gyrinidae

Régimbart M. 1882. Essai monographique de la famille des Gyrinidae View in CoL . 1e partie. Annales de la Société entomologique de France (6) 379–458 + 373 pls.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher’s website:

Figure S2 View Figure 2 . Bayesian analysis of nuclear genes only (H3, AK). Using same settings as those described in Figure S1 View Figure 1 . Number at nodes indicates posterior probability.

Figure S3 View Figure 3 . Preferred Bayesian tip-dating calibration analysis tree including Mesodineutes amurensis . Settings for analysis described in methods, using the Miller & Bergsten, 2012 partitioning scheme. Number at nodes indicate median 95% hpd age.

Figure S4 View Figure 4 . Bayesian tip-dating calibration analysis results excluding Mesodineutes amurensis , run under same settings as tree in Fig. S3 View Figure 3 . Number at nodes indicate posterior probability.

Figure S5 View Figure 5 . Bayesian tip-dating calibration analysis results including P. (Rhomborhynchus) depressus , highlighted in red, run under same settings as tree in Fig. S3 View Figure 3 . Numbers at nodes indicate posterior probability.

Figure S6 View Figure 6 . Bayesian tip-dating calibration analysis results including Mesodineutes amurensis . Settings for analysis described in methods, using the PartitionFinder partitioning scheme. Number at nodes indicate median 95% hpd age.

Figure S7 View Figure 7 . Bayesian node-calibration analysis. Settings for analysis described in methods, using the Miller & Bergsten, 2012 partitioning scheme. Number at nodes indicate median 95% hpd age.

Figure S8 View Figure 8 . Maximum likelihood tree. Analysis settings outlined in methods section. Numbers at nodes indicate boot strap support.

Figure S9 View Figure 9 . Morphological characters mapped on phylogenetic tree for Dineutini . Characters mapped using “fast” optimization in WinClada (ACCTRAN). Black hash marks indicate unambiguous changes, white hash marks indicate homoplasious changes or reversals. Numbers above hash marks are character numbers, those below hash marks are state numbers for the derived condition at that branch.

Figure S10 View Figure 10 . Ancestral state reconstruction results using DEC model. Label at node indicates probable state.

Figure S11 View Figure 11 . Ancestral state reconstruction results using DEC model. Pie chart at node indicates probable state. Figure S12 View Figure 12 . Ancestral state reconstruction results using DEC +j model. Label at node indicates probable state.

Figure S13 View Figure 13 . Ancestral state reconstruction results using DEC +j model. Pie chart at node shows probable ancestral states.

Figure S14 View Figure 14 . Ancestral state reconstruction results using DIVALIKE model. Label at node indicates probable state.

Figure S15. Ancestral state reconstruction results using DIVALIKE model. Pie chart at node shows probable ancestral states.

Figure S16. Ancestral state reconstruction results using DIVALIKE +j model. Label at node indicates probable state.

Figure S17. Ancestral state reconstruction results using DIVALIKE +j model. Pie chart at node shows probable ancestral states.

Table S1. Taxa included in the phylogenetic and biogeographic analyses of the Dineutini . Original subgenera proposed for species provided to show sampling coverage. Gene coverage for molecular character dataset is indicated for each taxon as is geographical coding used for the biogeographic analysis. GenBank voucher numbers given for new sequences generated by the study.

Table S2. Character coding for morphological dataset.

Table S3. Primers used for amplification and sequencing.

Table S4. Dispersal rate multiplier coding used for BioGeoBears ancestral state reconstruction analysis. Time strata from top to bottom are TS4, TS3, TS2, TS1.