Buenia pulvinus van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13358-023-00268-4 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ED255D-3B13-FF98-9A05-6D7BFB995486 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Buenia pulvinus van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers, 2022 |
status |
|
Buenia pulvinus van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers, 2022
Figure 19a–c View Fig
2022 Buenia pulvinus —van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers: pl. 20, Figs. 6–13 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig .
Material 9 specimens, Dar bel Hamri, Zanclean (figured specimens SMF PO 101.226 ) .
Discussion Te genus Buenia shows a remarkable diversity in otolith-based taxa in the Pliocene of the Mediterranean ( Schwarzhans et al., 2020; van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers, 2022). Two of the extant species ( B. affinis Iljin, 1930 , and B. massutii Kovačić, Ordines & Schliewen, 2017 ) have also been recorded as fossils from the Pliocene, in addition to the two extinct species B. pisiformis Schwarzhans et al., 2020 , and B. pulvinus van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers, 2022 . Van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers compared B. pulvinus with the extant B. affinis and mentioned the smaller size of the sulcus as the main distinguishing characteristic. Tis characteristic is shared by the Moroccan otoliths, which do not, however, exhibit any postdorsal projection as described by van Hinsbergh & Hoedemakers. I attribute the latter difference to the smaller size of the Moroccan otoliths compared to those from Estepona near Málaga.
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.