Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/zoosystema2019v41a7 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65E3A0BD-2AAD-4E12-9CB0-73C974BFCE65 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3729543 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEDE4B-FFED-FFB5-EFE9-FF4DB35FFAF4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 |
status |
|
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 View in CoL
( Fig. 2G View FIG )
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014: 97 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 3D-F.
CURRENT TAXONOMIC STATUS. — Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 View in CoL .
PARATYPE. — MNHN-IU-2014-11211 (= MNHN-B12314), 1 ♀ 36.6 × 44.3 mm Ecuador, St. Elena , Festa coll. — Original label: “ Gecarcinus Festae Nob. (cotype), St Helena, Festa, Ecuador, Nobili 1901, Muséum Paris ” .
PRESERVATION. — In alcohol.
REMARKS
Actually Nobili never published a description of Gecarcinus festae . In 1901 he described Sesarma festae and Uca festae and in the same paper referred to two specimens of Gecarcinus collected in Ecuador as Gecarcinus ruricola , a species restricted to western Atlantic islands ( Türkay 1970; Perger & Wall 2014). The abovementioned specimen, with the name of Nobili (1901) on the label, was likely collected by Enrico Festa during his 1895-1898 trip to Ecuador ( Viaggio del Dr. Enrico Festa nella Republica dell’Ecuador et regioni vicine), then studied by Nobili who probably first considered it as new and dedicated to Festa as “ Gecarcinus festae ” without finally establishing it. The unpublished binomen Gecarcinus festae is a nomen nudum. The MNHN specimen examined by Nobili and selected as paratype of the new species Gecarcinus nobilii dedicated to Nobili by Perger & Wall (2014) is figured in their fig. 3D-F. The holotype is preserved in LACM.
Furthermore, Pacific Gecarcinus ( Gecarcinus) lateralis quadratus sensu Türkay (1970: 338 ; see Prahl & Manjarrés 1984: 155) and Gecarcinus lateralis sensu Türkay 1987 (: 147, fig. 7) have been referred to as Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 . Note that Gecarcinus quadratus Saussure, 1853 was recently recognised as a valid species ( Toledano Carrasco & Villalobos Hiriart 2018).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
SubPhylum |
Crustacea |
Class |
|
Order |
|
InfraOrder |
Brachyura |
SuperFamily |
Grapsoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014
Ng, Ngan Kee, Rodríguez Moreno, Paula A., Naruse, Tohru, Guinot, Danièle & Mollaret, Noémy 2019 |