Boesenbergia
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2024.69.01.01 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F13E03-F302-FFA5-FFE7-2CA44A3AFA4B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Boesenbergia |
status |
|
Boesenbergia View in CoL relationships
Two well-supported clades of Boesenbergia taxa are retrieved in the combined analyses ( Fig. 1 View Fig ). The Boesenbergia s.str. clade, clade I, (80 % ML, 75 % MP, 1.00 PP) includes its type B. pulcherrima (Wall.) Kuntze and distichous flowering taxa; and the other, clade II, includes accessions of one-sided flowering Boesenbergia as well as the former genus Haplochorema (99 % ML, 99 % MP, 1.00 PP). In addition, two accessions of Boesenbergia outside these two clades are not resolved, B. siamensis and B. purpureorubra . The placement of B. siamensis was unaffected by sister-group choice, always falling sister to clade II, but the placement of B. purpureorubra varied, either falling sister to B. siamensis or sister to clade I ( Table 1). The chromosome counts of taxa in clade II are 2n = 24, but counts are available only for two Boesenbergia taxa, B. rotunda (L.) Mansf. and B. ochroleuca (Ridl.) Schltr. The chromosome count of B. siamensis is 2n = 24 ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Taxa in clade I have mostly 2n = 20 chromosomes though this ranges from 18 to 36 ( Goldblatt & Johnson 1991, Eksomtramage & Boontum 1995, Eksomtramage et al. 2002, Mood et al. 2018, 2019). Boesenbergia purpureorubra had a chromosome count of 2n = 20 ( Fig. 2 View Fig ). Morphology places these taxa confidently within Boesenbergia , but the molecular phylogenetic framework with these markers does not provide conclusive support for monophyly of the genus, or clear relationships within the genus beyond the two clades mentioned above.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.