Desmanthus topsenti Hentschel, 1912
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5401987 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14907554 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03F287BD-FFF1-E026-82BB-FB04A6CCFBA7 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Desmanthus topsenti Hentschel, 1912 |
status |
|
Desmanthus topsenti Hentschel, 1912 View in CoL
( Fig. 2G, H View FIG )
HOLOTYPE. — Aru Islands . Stn 77 , Merton coll. ( SMF 1560 About SMF ).
DISTRIBUTION. — Aru Islands (eastern Indonesia), on rocks at 20 m.
DESCRIPTION
Thinly encrusting, about 0.5 mm thick and 1.7 cm long. Surface hispid. Colour grey or brownish grey in alcohol. Structure compact.
Skeleton
The main skeleton consists of an irregular layer of desmas on which monactinal spicules are erected. Spicules
Desmas which can be separated in basally arranged smaller desmas ( Fig. 2H View FIG ), presumably desmas I, with more tuberculate cladi, dimensions: 240-270 × 20 µm, and peripherally arranged more robust desmas ( Fig. 2G View FIG ), presumably desmas II, dimensions cladome: 200- 310 × 30-45 µm. They are not clearly separated morphologically and the larger desmas lack a distinct rhabdome. Monactinal spicules are styles and rhabdostyles, variable in form, size and curvature, the smaller sizes tend to be rhabdostyles, dimensions: 224-1000 × 14-31 µm.
REMARKS
Hentschel (1912) states that this species differs from D. incrustans mainly in the absence of clear rhabdomes in the desmas. A syntype specimen from the Senckenberg Museum was re-examined (SMF 1560, from stn 77 of the Merton collection described by Hentschel). The rhabdomes are certainly inconspicuous, but nevertheless there is a clear division in thinner and more robust desmas. So far no other specimens of this species have been recorded, but it is possible that some of the Indian Ocean records of D. incrustans are referable to this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |