Coremacera halensis Loew, 1847
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.33910/2686-9519-2024-16-3-579-593 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:548FEE74-9157-4F80-9998-CFA05590AB8B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16965428 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0A2AC21B-FFB4-9676-FC90-FD622A091FB9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Coremacera halensis Loew, 1847 |
status |
|
Coremacera halensis Loew, 1847 View in CoL
Fig. 10 View Fig
Material: France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur region, Greolieres [43.795 ° N, 6.943 ° E], 24.08.1979, Heitmans, 1♂ ( ZMUM) GoogleMaps .
Discussion. Both Rozkosny (1987: 45–47) and Vala (1989: 147–154) characterized C. halensis as species similar to C. fabricii . According to the authors these species differ as follows:
— Anterior wing margin mainly dark brown, at most with 3–5 small pale spots. Mesonotum densely grey dusted; with large and distinct dark spots around bases of setulae (as in C. marginata ) and with some larger brown spots in addition. Postpedicel of equilateral triangle shape, shorter. Femora bicolour, with dark bases........... halensis Loew. — Anterior wing margin mainly pale, with more numerous pale spots. Mesonotum thinly dusted, brownish; with small dark spots around bases of setulae and with larger brown spots absent or indistinct. Postpedicel of trapezoid shape, elongated. Femora unicolour..... fabricii Rozkosny. I have a single male from France which entirely fits C. halensis criteria ( Fig. 10 View Fig ). All 20 specimens from Central European Russia listed here entirely fit C. fabricii criteria. This is an argument for the validity of C. halensis . However, there are serious arguments against it as well. (1) Genitalia of the male identified as C. halensis was examined and found the same as in C. fabricii . (2) To fill the lack of Western European material I examined images of C. fabricii at https://diptera.info/ photogallery.php site. I found interesting images from Germany, Wernigerode [51.8 ° N, 10.8 ° E], 8.05.2009 ( Figs 11, 12 View Figs 11–12 ). Both specimens were photographed at the same place and time, they look as typical C. fabricii except for the wing pattern. A female has the wings of C. halensis , while male has those of C. fabricii . Thus, the wing pattern can’t be used as reliable diagnostic character.
Comparing this case with C. m. pontica, I believe that most probably there are two subspecies: C. halensis halensis in the very west of Europe and C. halensis fabricii in the rest of the territory, with a contact zone in Germany. More European material is required for final conclusion.
ZMUM |
Zoological Museum, University of Amoy |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |