Achanius ( Ambigatus ) Fairmaire, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X-69.mo4.167 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4911733 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/182B9F50-FFEF-FFDF-FD71-FE61FCE7FB71 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Achanius ( Ambigatus ) Fairmaire, 1892 |
status |
|
Subgenus Achanius ( Ambigatus) Fairmaire, 1892
( Figs. 14–20 View Figs View Figs , 22 View Figs )
Ambigatus Fairmaire 1892: 246 . Gebien 1910: 81 (catalog), 1937: 579 (catalog); Bruch 1915: 264 (catalog); Blackwelder 1945: 511 (catalog); Doyen 1994: 500.
Type species: Ambigatus stricticollis Fairmaire, 1892 .
Achanius ( Ambigatus) : Kulzer 1950: 31 (revision), 1956: 901 (revision).
Diagnosis. Kulzer ( 1950 in key) stated the humeri are not elevated and hind wings are present. This study: metasternum 3X length of mesosternum; metacoxal width 3X metacoxal length; distance between meso– and metacoxae 2.5X metacoxal length ( Fig. 20 View Figs ).
Biology. Species of Achanius ( Ambigatus) are winged, capable of flying, and of crepuscular and nocturnal habits. They were collected at white and UV lights, also using pitfall traps partly filled with water and propylene glycol ( Flores et al. 2004; Lagos 2004), and cattle dung-baited pitfall traps.
Species Included. Achanius rufonitens , A. stricticollis , A. bicolor , A. rhinosomoides , A. piceus , A. wittmeri ( Kulzer 1950, 1956), and Achanius ( Ambigatus) antofagastensis Flores and Aballay, new species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Tribe |
Evaniosomini |
Genus |
Achanius ( Ambigatus ) Fairmaire, 1892
Flores, Gustavo E. & Aballay, Fernando H. 2015 |
Achanius ( Ambigatus )
Kulzer 1950: 31 |
Ambigatus
Doyen 1994: 500 |
Blackwelder 1945: 511 |
Bruch 1915: 264 |
Gebien & Tenebrionidae II & In & Coleopterorum Catalogus XVII 1910: 81 |
Fairmaire 1892: 246 |