Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840)

Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4

Figs 1–16. Species of Vetigastropoda – Figs 1–6. Jumaramaria jumaraensis n. gen., n. sp. – 1–4. Apical, basal, abapertural, and apertural views, ×1.4. – 5. Details of the ramp at higher magnification, ×2.5. – 6. Details of the selenizone ornament, ×4.4. – Figs 7–11. Solarioconulus kachchhensis n. sp., holotype. – 7–10. Abapertural, apical, apertural, and basal views, ×2. – 11. Magnified view of a boring system from the last whorl, ×3. – Figs 12–16. Chartronella belaensis n. sp. holotype. – 12–15. Abapertural, apertural, apical, and basal views, ×3.4. – 16. Details of shell part with spiral ornament remnants, ×11

Figs 31–59. Caenogastropods 1. – Figs 31–33. Zygopleura sp. – 31. Both specimens, ×5.5. – 32. Details of the earliest preserved whorls, ×13.5.– 33. The last whorl specimen from upper left corner of Fig. 31, ×7. – Figs 34–35. Procerithium (Rhabdocolpus)? aff. lorierei (Hebert et Deslongchamps, 1860). – 34. Full view, ×3.3. – 35. Magnified details, ×7. – Fig. 36. Magnified “best” view of Diatrypesis sp. 1, ×3.8. – Figs 37–40. Diatrypesis sp. 2. – 37–38. BHU2020I 10 specimen. – 37. Side view of full remnant, ×3.7. – 38. Details of pattern on the same specimen, ×7. – 39–40. BHU2020I 11 specimen. – 39. Side view of full remnant, ×4.2. – 40. Riblets on the earliest whorl of the same specimen, ×7.2.– Figs 41–42.Diatrypesis? sp.– 41.“Apertural” view of the available, flattened specimen,×1.7. – 42. Side view,×1.7. – Figs 43–59. Exelissa indiana n. sp.– 43–45. Holotype.– 43–44. Apertural, and abapertural view, ×4. – 45. Ornament details of the holotype in ×7.8 magnification. The holotype in Figs 43–44 and six paratypes (BHU2020I 14–19) in Figs 46–59 are equally magnified (×4) to demonstrate the high size variability among the full-grown shells. The same shells well show also the high shape, and ornament variability. The photo in Fig. 58 (BHU2020I 19) is taken parallel to the most frequent final peristome plane, ×6. – Fig. 59. Perpendicular view to the plane of the trumpet like peristome, ×6.2. Detailed data between the figures, the measurements, and the inventory numbers of the types are supplied above, in the species description

Figs 60–66. Caenogastropods 2. – Fig. 60. A piece of naturally prepared bed plane with a fossil assemblage, containing also new species for the Kachchh Callovian fauna; letters indicate position of the gastropod specimens. – Figs 61–63. Exelissa aff. strangulata (d’Archiac, 1840). – 61. Apertural view, ×4.4. – 62. Abapertural view, ×5. – 63. Apertural view, ×3.5. – Figs 64–65. Exelissa? sp, ×8.8. – 64. The original view on another broken rock surface. – 65. A variety of Fig. 64, to make it more digestible through reflection, and inversion of colour. – Fig. 66. Cerithioidea? sp., a poorly preserved specimen, indicating a siphonostomatous species,also new for the Callovian fauna of Kachchh, ×3.4