Apis testacea Smith, 1857
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1028.3129 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:06182A07-5DB6-4916-86AF-673865690CE2 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/251C1E7D-FFA3-1672-FDD4-10B6FAC957DF |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Apis testacea Smith, 1857 |
| status |
|
17. Apis testacea Smith, 1857 View in CoL
Fig. 20
Apis testacea Smith, 1857: 49–50 View in CoL , ♀.
Type material examined
Lectotype
MALAYSIA • ♀; Sar [ Sarawak]; [ 29 Oct. 1854 – 10 Feb. 1856]; OUMNH, ENT-HYME2778-01 . Paralectotype
MALAYSIA • 1 ♀; Sar [ Sarawak]; [ 29 Oct. 1854 – 10 Feb. 1856]; OUMNH, ENT-HYME2778-02 .
Type locality
Borneo [not specified, but de facto Sarawak].
Notes
This species was not dealt with by Baker (1993). There are two identical females in the OUMNH collection, both of which are labelled as coming from Sarawak. One of them is selected as the lectotype, by present designation. Maa (1953: 566) gave A. testacea as a synonym of A. dorsata Fabricius, 1793 using the incorrect publication year of 1858.
Current status
Apis dorsata Fabricius, 1793 ( Maa 1953).
Distribution
Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, China, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia (Peninsula, Borneo), Indonesia ( Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan) ( Ascher & Pickering 2024). This distribution is slightly unclear due to the inconsistent recognition of Apis laboriosa Smith, 1871 and Apis binghami Cockerell, 1906 (see text under Section 28. Apis zonata ) as valid species in the literature ( Kitnya et al. 2020, 2024).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Apis testacea Smith, 1857
| Wood, T. J., Risch, S., Orr, M. C. & Hogan, J. E. 2025 |
Apis testacea
| Smith F. 1857: 50 |
