Amegilla maderae (Sichel, 1868)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5723.3.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A9792260-0AAE-4EE1-976E-0BAFE0C41302 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/262FD025-AE2A-6147-FF32-F2C3FCEC9101 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Amegilla maderae |
| status |
|
Amegilla maderae View in CoL versus A. quadrifasciata
Amegilla maderae is markedly larger in female body characters than A. quadrifasciata for the following variables: body length (BL; p <0.0001), metasoma length (MTL; p <0.0001), and metasoma width (MTW; p <0.0001), scutum-scutellum length (SCL; p = 0.0081) and scutum width including tegulae (TSCW; p = 0.003), and weakly different in wing length (WL; p = 0.025). In males, only three variables are significantly larger in A. maderae : scutum width including tegulae (TSCW; p = 0.00063), metasoma length (MTL; p = 0.026) and scutum-scutellum length (SCL; p = 0.0016).
The regression lines between the first shape PC and the isosize axis are clearly separated in both sexes ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ). The PCA ratio spectrum separating the two species is documented in females by the ratio of eye length/interocular upper distance (EL/IDU) to labrum length/scutum-scutellum length (LL/SCL) and in males by the ratio of eye width/scutum-scutellum length (EW/SCL) to interocular lower distance/labrum width (IDL/LW).
The variables flagellomere 2 (FL2) and proximal length of the submarginal cell (CU2a) in females and in males are responsible for the differentiation of the shape PC1.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
