Amegilla teneriffensis (Cockerell, 1930) Kratochwil & Paxton & Aguiar & Husemann, 2025
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5723.3.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A9792260-0AAE-4EE1-976E-0BAFE0C41302 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/262FD025-AE2A-6147-FF32-F4CBFDD090BD |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Amegilla teneriffensis |
| status |
|
Amegilla teneriffensis versus A. maderae
Amegilla teneriffensis is significantly larger in female body characters than A. maderae for three variables: scutum-scutellum length (SCL; p <0.0001), wing length (WL; p = 0.00063), and body length (BL; p = 0.041). There is only one weakly significant variable that is larger in males of A. teneriffensis : metasoma width (MTW; p = 0.032).
The regression lines between the first shape PC and the isosize axis are clearly separated in the two taxa for both sexes ( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 ). The PCA ratio spectrum separating the two species is characterised in females by the ratio of interocular upper distance/interocular lower distance to labrum length/proximal length of the submarginal cell (IDU/IDL: LL/Cu2a), and in males by the ratio of head length/flagellomere 3 length to flagellomere 2 length/ clypeus width (HL/FL3: FL2/CLW).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
