Lespedeza, IN
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3767/blumea.2019.64.03.07 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/316987B7-0B69-FFE0-FF8E-FA7BFD3AF79F |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Lespedeza |
| status |
|
LESPEDEZA IN View in CoL MALESIA
In this section only names, synonyms, notes, a key to the species, and excluded species will be given. Full genus and species descriptions will be given in Flora Malesiana and can be found in some of the literature cited.
Lespedeza Michx. (1803) View in CoL 70; Miq. (1855) 230; Taub. (1894) 332; Backer & Bakh.f. (1964) 613; Verdc. (1979) 383; O.N.Allen & E.K. Allen (1981) 384; G.P. Lewis et al. (2005) 435. — Lectotype (designated by Britton & Brown 1913): Lespedeza sessiliflora Michx. View in CoL (= L. virginica View in CoL (L.) Britton).
Campylotropis Bunge (1835) View in CoL 157; Miq. (1855) 229; O.N.Allen & E.K. Allen (1981) 132; G.P. Lewis et al. (2005) 434. — Lespedeza Michx. sect. Campylotropis (Bunge) Taub. (1894) 332. — Type: Campylotropis chinensis Bunge View in CoL (= Lespedeza macrocarpa Bunge View in CoL ).
Phlebosporium Jungh. (1845) 346 (‘ Phlebosprium ’); Hassk. (1847) 508 (‘ Phlebosporum View in CoL ’). — Type: Phlebosporium cytisoides Jungh. (= Lespedeza junghuhniana Bakh.f. View in CoL ).
Notes — 1. Root nodules were observed in several species ( Allen & Allen 1981).
2. Phlebosporium was accidentally spelled ‘ Phlebosprium ’ in Junghuhn (1845). Hasskarl (1847) and Taubert (1894, in the synonymy of sect. Campylotropis ) used ‘ Phlebosporum ’.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
Lespedeza
| Adema, F. 2019 |
Lespedeza Michx. sect. Campylotropis (Bunge)
| Taub. 1894 |
Phlebosporium
| Jungh. 1845 |
Phlebosprium
| F.W.Junghuhn 1845 |
Campylotropis
| Bunge 1835 |
Lespedeza
| Michx. 1803 |