Chelaner longinodis (Heterick, 2001)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5723.2.6 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F9D60D8-599A-4E21-98AF-DF10F30FE5EA |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A7E87F8-4E5E-FFD9-FF13-FA37FC59F936 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Chelaner longinodis |
| status |
|
Chelaner longinodis View in CoL — Monomorium longinode Heterick, 2001: 393
Longinodis is adjectival, as it is formed from the same process as the Latin word enodis, through a suffixal -is /- e applied to the Latin noun nodus. However, the etymology given for M. longinode is "long node" ( Heterick 2001), which suggests that this is meant to be a compound noun. There is no nominative noun form in Latin which ends in - e, and other cases are not permissable according to Article 11.9. There is a nominative neuter adjectival ending, - e, as in node. This is not a case of poor latinization, as the Glossary defines that process as only applying to words which are not Latin. As node is a valid adjectival form in Latin, the simplest reading is that the Latin etymology is meant to be mean 'long-noded'. Article 31.2 does not mention authorial intent or etymological notes when considering whether a species-group name is Latin; it merely states that if a word ends in a Latin adjective, it must agree in gender. As such, this name is changed to longinodis when it is recombined.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Chelaner longinodis
| Littauer, Richard 2025 |
Chelaner longinodis
| Heterick, B. E. 2001: 393 |
