Piper rhytidocarpum Hook
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.338.1.2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4012878C-FF88-7463-6DF2-82A0FAFCFAE2 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Piper rhytidocarpum Hook |
status |
|
18. Piper rhytidocarpum Hook View in CoL , f. Fl. Brit. India 5(13): 92. 1886.
Replaced synonym:— Piper nigrum Linn. var. macrostachyum C. DC. Prodr. 16: 363. 1869 non Piper macrostachyum (C. Presl.) C. DC.
Prodr. 16: 371. 186. Type:— INDIA: Meghalaya, Khasia mountains, Hook. f. & T. Thomson s. n. ( holotype G-DC G 00207656 image!; isotype CAL!, K
000794409 image!). P. crassistipes C. DC. Candollea View in CoL 2: 214. 1925 syn. nov. Type:— INDIA: Assam, Jenkins s. n. ( holotype BO130555!; isotype CAL!). P. glabramentum C. DC. Candollea View in CoL 2: 211. 1925 syn. nov. Type:— INDIA: Assam, Namrod forest, Mann s. n. ( lectotype designated here CAL!; isolectotype G-DC G00314035 image!; syntype
Goalpara, Lidli Duars plains, King’s collector s. n. CAL!, G-DC G00314813 image!, Fischer s. n. CAL!, K000794452 image!, GDC G 00314844 image!).
Distribution:— INDIA: Assam, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Tripura; CHINA, MYANMAR.
Note:— Piper nigrum var. macrostachyum was based on the specimen ‘Khasia mountains, Hook. f. & T. T. s.n. ’ held at G-DC. The same is also present at CAL and K with de Candolle’s annotation. Hooker (1886: 92) recognized the taxon at the specific rank as P. rhytidocarpum¸ without stating it explicitly as a replacement name for P. nigrum var. macrostachyum , so as not to create a later homonym of P. macrostachyum (C. Presl) C. DC. [1869: 371; basionym: Artanthe macrostachya C. Presl. (1851: 227) ]. Hooker ( loc. cit.) needlessly cited three additional specimens: Wallich 6658B, Griffith s.n., and Chittagong, J. D. H. & T. T. s.n. Notwithstanding citation of additional material by Hooker ( loc. cit.), the name P. rhytidocarpum is typified by P. nigrum var. macrostachyum C. DC. (.c.f.. Art. 7.4, McNeill et al.,2012)., with the type located at G-DC. Since only a single collection was cited, this must be accepted as the holotype. Therefore, the action by Gilbert & Xia (1999: 194) in designating ‘ Bangladesh, Chittagong, 22 Sep. 1850, Hooker & Thomson s.n.’ at K as the lectotype turns out to be incorrect. Piper glabramentum is similar to this species and hence it is recognized as a synonym. The same is true for P. crassistipes , when its holotype at BO, isotype at CAL, or the pencilled sketch of the foliage by C. de Candolle at G-DC (G 00329644) are compared.
T |
Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics |
CAL |
Botanical Survey of India |
K |
Royal Botanic Gardens |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Piper rhytidocarpum Hook
Mukherjee, Prasanta Kumar 2018 |
P. crassistipes
C. DC. Candollea 1925: 214 |
P. glabramentum
C. DC. Candollea 1925: 211 |