Xanthopenthes manettii, Platia & Pulvirenti, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.57800/faunitaxys-11(31) |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7A874A3C-6EB2-4859-BBAA-55E1B15346A3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/550687F6-FFAD-FF9A-EED5-4A8CFDE08F71 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Xanthopenthes manettii |
status |
sp. nov. |
Xanthopenthes manettii n. sp.
( Fig. 15, 37, 49, 74)
ZooBank:http://zoobank.org/ AE10FD7B-B378-4EDE-B019-FAE4C2376837
Holotype, ♂, Indonesia, South Sulawesi, Rantepao env., South slope of Mt. Sesean , 1300-1600 m, 3.IV.1999, Bečvář & Zábransky ( CPG).
Fig. 68-80. Habitus.
68. Procraerus javanus n. sp. (5.4 mm). 69. Procraerus indicus n. sp. (9.0 mm). 70. Procraerus smetsi n. sp. (9.3 mm). 71. Procraerus grootaerti n. sp. (8.7 mm). 72. Procraerus mindanaoensis n. sp. (11.2 mm). 73. Procraerus sikkimensis n. sp. (10.5 mm). 74. Xanthopenthes manettii n. sp. (15 mm). 75. Xanthopenthes tamilensis n. sp. (8.4 mm). 76. Xanthopenthes viklundi n. sp. (9.2 mm). 77. Xanthopenthes cambodianus n. sp. (8.0 mm). 78. Xanthopenthes constanti n. sp. (9.6 mm). 79. Xanthopenthes nigerrimus n. sp. (13 mm). 80. Xanthopenthes lemoulti n. sp. (11.2 mm).
Diagnosi s. – A species of the X. miser -group sensu Schimmel, 1999, that can be compared with X. girardi Schimmel, 1999 , too from Sulawesi, for the long antennae, it can be separated by the greater size and particularly for the elytral apices slightly emarginate.
Description. – Male.
Moderately shiny.
Coloration. – Entirely yellow-brown with vague, not well delimited, black maculae on the disk and sides of pronotum, disk of elytra in the humeral areas and after the middle; only the legs are lighter, yellowish; covered with dense, decumbent, yellowish pubescence.
Head. – Frons flat, anterior margin complete, sub-arcuate, directed downwards and just protruding above the clypeus; frontal-clypeal space not constricted and with a vestige of mid-longitudinal carina; punctuation coarse, punctures clearly umbilicate, contiguous or with shortest, shagreened intervals. – Antennae very long, exceeding of four articles the apices of posterior angles of pronotum, slightly serrated from the third article on; second article small, globous, long as wide, third-tenth sub-triangular, gradually slenderer, longitudinally sub-carinate; third shorter than the fourth; second and third, taken together, shorter than the fourth; last very slender, longer than the previous, with sub-parallel sides and asymmetrically constricted before the apex. (Fig. 37).
Pronotum. – Pronotum 1.07 longer than wide, widest at the apices of the posterior angles, very convex on the disk, abruptly sloping at sides, nearly vertically at base with a short, deep impression on the basal slope; sides very moderately and regularly arcuate, sinuate before the posterior angles, the latter vey elongate, acuminate, divergent, bicarinate; carinae at the same level, the inner shorter, the outer longer and slightly diverging from the lateral margins, the latter very fine, complete and not visible on a dorsal view; punctuation very dense and uniformly distributed; punctures on the disk simple with shortest, moderately shagreened intervals, gradually denser and clearly umbilicate towards the sides with shortest shagreened intervals.
Scutellum . – Very declivous, tongue-shaped, moderately convex, densely and roughly punctured.
Elytra. – 2.7x longer than pronotum and 2.9x longer than wide, convex; sides sub-parallel from base to behind the middle then gradually tapering to the apices, the latter very slightly emarginate and very shortly spiniform ( Fig. 49); striae regularly punctate-striate, interstriae sub-convex and densely punctured.
Prosternal process. – Gradually bent behind the procoxal cavities, not emarginate at the apex.
Aedeagus. – As in the Fig. 15 (length 2.0 mm).
Size. – Length 15.0 mm, width 3.43 mm.
Female. – Unknown.
Etymology. – This taxon is dedicated to the ornithologist Claudio Grispigni Manetti, a dear friend of the second author, for his support during the search for the equipment necessary for the preparation of the illustrations of this work.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.