Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003 SDI
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5679.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:433583E2-2321-477E-AD5D-A8544AC6CC9B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17050088 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/664B817F-0F18-FFE5-A099-23A4656AFDB0 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003 SDI |
status |
|
Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003 SDI
Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003: 40 (original description; published type locality: Keylong, India); Korneev & Cate, 2005: 22 ( type catalogue); Cate, 2007: 155 (catalogue; “UP” as India: Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2B” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Uttar Pradesh ”).
Type Locality. India: Keylong, Lahaul and Spiti District , Himachal Pradesh [India, Uttar Pradesh, Lahaul Valley, Keylong] .
Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CSV); 3 Paratypes, 1 M, 2 F ( CCW, CSV, SIZK).
Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Lahaul and Spiti District).
General Distribution. India.
Remark. As the presence of this species in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand requires confirmation, these localities are not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.
CCW |
Casper College |
SIZK |
Schmaulhausen Institute of Zoology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hypnoidinae |
Tribe |
Hypnoidini |
Genus |
Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003 SDI
Parekar, Harshad & Patwardhan, Amol 2025 |
Hypnoidus problematicus
Platia, G. & Sechi, D. 2022: 380 |
Gupta, D. & Chandra, K. & Das, P. & Ghosh, J. 2018: 501 |
Cate, P. 2007: 155 |
Korneev, V. A. & Cate, P. 2005: 22 |
Dolin, V. G. & Cate, P. C. 2003: 40 |