Hypnoidus Dillwyn, 1829

Genus Hypnoidus Dillwyn, 1829 View in CoL

Hypnoidus alpinus ( Vats & Chauhan, 1992) SDI

Ctenicera alpinus Vats & Chauhan, 1992: 30 (original description; type locality: Marhi , India).

Selatosomus alpinus ( Vats & Chauhan, 1992) : Tarnawski, 1996: 638 (transferred to Selatosomus (Selatosomus) ; catalogue; “ India: Himachal Pradesh ”); Tarnawski, 2001: 296 (catalogue); Cate, 2007: 182 (marked as Doubtful Assignment; catalogue; “HP” as India: Himachal Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 502 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ).

Hypnoidus alpinus ( Vats & Chauhan, 1992) : Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (transferred to Hypnoidus View in CoL ; checklist; “ India: Himachal Pradesh ”).

Type Locality. India: Marhi, Kullu District , Himachal Pradesh .

Type Depository. Holotype, M (??); 8 Paratypes, 4 M, 4 F (??).

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Kullu District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. The type material is not present in FRID and may be deposited in IARI, but this could not be verified. As the presence of this species in Jammu & Kashmir requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus arunachalensis Platia & Pulvirenti, 2024 SDI

Hypnoidus arunachalensis Platia & Pulvirenti, 2024: 416 (original description; published type locality: Sela Pass , India).

Type Locality. India: Sela Pass, Tawang District , Arunachal Pradesh .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CRB).

General Distribution. India.

Distribution in India. Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang District).

Remark. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus audryae Stibick, 1980 SDI

Hypnoidus audryae Stibick, 1980: 253 (original description; published type locality: Giri R. Gorge, India); Dolin & Cate, 2001: 122 (re-examined Paratype; “ India, N. Cumaon, Gori R. Gorge”); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “UP” as India: Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2B” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Uttar Pradesh ”).

Type Locality. India: Gori River Gorge, Pithoragarh District , Uttarakhand .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( NHML) ; Allotype, F ( NHML); 11 Paratypes, SU ( NHML) .

Distribution in India. Uttarakhand (Almora District, Bageshwar District, Pithoragarh District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in Himachal Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh requires confirmation, these localities are not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus beckeri Stibick, 1980 SRI

Hypnoidus beckeri Stibick, 1980: 254 (original description; published type locality: Gautsa, Tibet; other localities- India: Sikkim, West Bengal); Dolin & Cate, 2001: 122 (re-examined Paratypes; “ India, Sikkim ”); Chakraborty & Chakrabarti, 2006: 194 (catalogue; India: “ West Bengal (Darjeeling), Sikkim ”); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “SD” as India: Sikkim, Darjeeling District); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2C” as India: Sikkim, Darjeeling District); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Sikkim ”).

Type Locality. Tibet: Gautsa ** .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( NHML) ; Allotype, F ( NHML); 239 Paratypes, SU ( MNHN, NHML) .

Material examined. Two specimens ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–6 ) were examined from Kullu District , Himachal Pradesh ( FRID) .

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Kullu District), Sikkim (Gangtok District, Gyalshing District, Mangan District, Pakyong District), West Bengal (Darjeeling District).

General Distribution. China (Tibet), India, Nepal ( Platia & Sechi 2022).

Remark. This represents the first published record of this species from Himachal Pradesh.

Hypnoidus cachemirensis ( Candèze, 1897) SDI

Cryptohypnus cachemirensis Candèze, 1897: 52 (original description; published type locality: Cachemire, India); Stibick, 1980: 261 (designated Lectotype; “ Kashmir ”).

Hypnoidus cachemirensis ( Candèze, 1897) : Schwarz, 1906: 153 (listed as cachmirensis [sic], unavailable species name, incorrect subsequent spelling of cachemirensis not in prevailing usage- ICZN 1999, Art. 33.3; catalogue; India: “Kaschmir”); Schenkling, 1925: 201 (placed under subgenus Hypnoidus View in CoL ; catalogue; India: “Kaschmir”); Stibick, 1980: 260 ( India: Jammu & Kashmir ); Platia, 1988: 6 ( India: “ Kashmir ”); Dolin & Cate, 2001: 123 (re-examined Lectotype; India: “Kaschmir”); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “HP” as India: Himachal Pradesh; “KA” as India: Kashmir ); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Kashmir ”).

Hypnoidus himalayensis Stibick, 1980: 261 (original description; published type locality: Simla [sic], India; another locality- India: Jammu & Kashmir ); Dolin & Cate, 2001: 123 (re-examined Paratype; “ India, Kashmir ”; synonymised with H. cachemirensis ).

Type Locality. Cryptohypnus cachemirensis . India: Jammu & Kashmir [ Kashmir ]; Hypnoidus himalayensis . India: Shimla District, Himachal Pradesh.

Type Depository. Cryptohypnus cachemirensis : Lectotype, M ( RBINS). Hypnoidus himalayensis : Holotype, M ( RBINS) ; Allotype, F ( NHML); 1 Paratype, M ( NHML) .

Material examined. Seven specimens were examined from Anantnag & Ganderbal districts, Jammu & Kashmir (FRID) .

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Kullu District, Shimla District), Jammu & Kashmir (Anantnag District, Baramulla District, Ganderbal District).

General Distribution. India, Pakistan ( Cate 2007; Platia & Sechi 2022).

Hypnoidus candezei Fleutiaux, 1905 SDI

Cryptohypnus indicus Candèze, 1900: 92 (nec indicus Motschulsky, 1858 ; original description; published type locality: Dalhousie, India).

Hypnoidus candezei Fleutiaux, 1905: 326 (replacement name for Cryptohypnus indicus Candèze ); Schenkling, 1925: 210 (placed under subgenus Zorochrus , unavailable subgenus name, incorrect subsequent spelling of Zorochros not in prevailing usage- ICZN 1999: Art. 33.3; catalogue; India: “Pendjab”); Dolin & Cate, 2001: 123 (re-examined Type; “Dalhousie”); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “HP” as India: Himachal Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Punjab”).

Hypnoidus indicus ( Candèze, 1900) : Schwarz, 1906: 153 (catalogue; India: “Pundjap”).

Type Locality. India: Dalhousie, Chamba District , Himachal Pradesh .

Type Depository. Holotype, F ( NHML).

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Chamba District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. It appears that Schwarz (1906: 153) was unaware of the replacement name proposed by Fleutiaux (1905: 326) for Cryptohypnus indicus Candèze , which was preoccupied by Cryptohypnus indicus Motschulsky. Historically, Dalhousie was part of Punjab, British India, but it is now located in Himachal Pradesh. As the presence of this species in Jammu & Kashmir requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus chassaini Platia & Sechi, 2022 SDI

Hypnoidus chassaini Platia & Sechi, 2022: 377 (original description; published type locality: Flowers Valley , India).

Type Locality. India: Flowers Valley, Chamoli District , Uttarakhand .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CPG).

Distribution in India. Uttarakhand (Chamoli District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. Known only from a male specimen. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus deuvei Dolin & Cate, 2001 SDI

Hypnoidus deuvei Dolin & Cate, 2001: 124 (original description; published type locality: Bhadarwah, India); Korneev & Cate, 2005: 14 (type catalogue); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “KA” as India: Kashmir ); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Kashmir ”).

Type Locality. India: Bhaderwah [Bhadarwah], Doda District, Jammu & Kashmir .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( SIZK); 8 Paratypes, 4 M, 4 F ( SIZK).

Distribution in India. Jammu & Kashmir (Doda District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in Himachal Pradesh requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus heinrichi Stibick, 1980 SRI

Hypnoidus heinrichi Stibick, 1980: 270 (original description; published type locality: Jelap La, Tibet; another locality- India: Sikkim); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “SD” as India: Sikkim, Darjeeling District); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2C” as India: Sikkim, Darjeeling District); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Sikkim ”).

Type Locality. Tibet: Jelap La ** .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( NHML) ; Allotype, F ( MNHN); 2 Paratypes, 2 F ( MNHN, NHML). Distribution in India. Sikkim ( Pakyong District ) .

General Distribution. China, India, Nepal ( Cate 2007; Platia & Sechi 2022).

Remark. As the presence of this species in West Bengal requires confirmation, this locality is not included here.

Hypnoidus leseigneuri Stibick, 1980 SDI

Hypnoidus leseigneuri Stibick, 1980: 265 (original description; published type locality: Tangu, India); Dolin & Cate, 2001: 125 (re-examined Holotype; “ Sikkim, Tangu”); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “SD” as India: Sikkim, Darjeeling District); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2C” as India: Sikkim, Darjeeling District); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Sikkim ”).

Type Locality. India: Thangu [Tangu], Mangan District , Sikkim .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( NHML).

Distribution in India. Sikkim (Mangan District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in West Bengal requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus mendeli Dolin & Cate, 2001 SDI

Hypnoidus mendeli Dolin & Cate, 2001: 125 (original description; published type locality: Rohtang Pass, India); Korneev & Cate, 2005: 19 (type catalogue); Cate, 2007: 154 (catalogue; “HP” as India: Himachal Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Himachal Pradesh ”).

Type Locality. India: Rohtang Pass , Himachal Pradesh [NW India, Himachal Pradesh, Rohtang Pass, Khoksar alpine meadows] .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( SIZK); 114 Paratypes, SU ( CCW, CMK, NHML, SIZK).

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Kullu District, Lahaul and Spiti District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in Jammu & Kashmir requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus nadaii Platia, 2016 SDI

Hypnoidus nadaii Platia, 2016: 63 (original description; published type locality: Kirti Glacier, India); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Uttarakhand ”).

Type Locality. India: Kirti Glacier, Uttarkashi District , Uttarakhand .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( HNHM); 2 Paratypes, 2 M ( CPG, HNHM).

Distribution in India. Uttarakhand (Uttarkashi District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus persimilis Dolin & Cate, 2001 SDI

Hypnoidus persimilis Dolin & Cate, 2001: 127 (original description; published type locality: Doda, India); Korneev & Cate, 2005: 21 (type catalogue); Cate, 2007: 155 (catalogue; “KA” as India: Kashmir ); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Kashmir ”).

Type Locality. India: Doda District , Jammu & Kashmir .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( SIZK); 2 Paratypes, 1 M, 1 F ( SIZK).

Distribution in India. Jammu & Kashmir (Doda District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in Himachal Pradesh requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003 SDI

Hypnoidus problematicus Dolin & Cate, 2003: 40 (original description; published type locality: Keylong, India); Korneev & Cate, 2005: 22 (type catalogue); Cate, 2007: 155 (catalogue; “UP” as India: Uttaranchal, Uttar Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2B” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Uttar Pradesh ”).

Type Locality. India: Keylong, Lahaul and Spiti District , Himachal Pradesh [ India, Uttar Pradesh, Lahaul Valley, Keylong] .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CSV); 3 Paratypes, 1 M, 2 F ( CCW, CSV, SIZK).

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Lahaul and Spiti District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand requires confirmation, these localities are not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus reuteri Platia & Sechi, 2022 SDI

Hypnoidus reuteri Platia & Sechi, 2022: 378 (original description; published type locality: Mahri , India).

Type Locality. India: Marhi [Mahri], Kullu District , Himachal Pradesh .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CPG); 1 Paratype, 1 F ( CPG).

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Kullu District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus selaensis Platia & Pulvirenti, 2024 SDI

Hypnoidus selaensis Platia & Pulvirenti, 2024: 416 (original description; published type locality: Sela Pass , India).

Type Locality. India: Sela Pass, Tawang District , Arunachal Pradesh .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CRB).

Distribution in India. Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus subnivosus ( Vats & Chauhan, 1992) SDI

Ctenicera subnivosus Vats & Chauhan, 1992: 31 (original description; type locality: Khoksar, India); Cate, 2007: 182 (marked as species incertae sedis; catalogue; “HP” as India: Himachal Pradesh); Gupta et al., 2018: 503 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ).

Hypnoidus subnivosus ( Vats & Chauhan, 1992) : Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (transferred to Hypnoidus View in CoL ; checklist; “ India: Himachal Pradesh ”).

Type Locality. India: Khoksar, Lahaul and Spiti District , Himachal Pradesh .

Type Depository. Holotype, F (??); 1 Paratype, 1 F (??).

Distribution in India. Himachal Pradesh (Lahaul and Spiti District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. The type material is not present in FRID and may be deposited in IARI, but this could not be verified. As the presence of this species in Jammu & Kashmir requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus topali Dolin & Cate, 2001 SDI

Hypnoidus topali Dolin & Cate, 2001: 128 (original description; published type locality: Gulmarg, India); Korneev & Cate, 2005: 24 (type catalogue); Cate, 2007: 155 (catalogue; “KA” as India: Kashmir ); Platia & Sechi, 2022: 380 (checklist; “ India: Kashmir ”); Gupta et al., 2018: 501 (catalogue; “2A” as India: Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir ).

Type Locality. India: Gulmarg , Baramulla District, Jammu & Kashmir .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( HNHM); 3 Paratypes, 3 F ( HNHM, SIZK).

Distribution in India. Jammu & Kashmir (Baramulla District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. As the presence of this species in Himachal Pradesh requires confirmation, this locality is not included here. The species is considered endemic to India.

Hypnoidus zeisingi Platia & Sechi, 2022 SDI

Hypnoidus zeisingi Platia & Sechi, 2022: 378 (original description; published type locality: Tawang, India); Platia & Pulvirenti, 2024: 418 (checklist; “ India: Arunachal Pradesh ”).

Type Locality. India: Tawang District , Arunachal Pradesh [env. 20 km W of Sela Pass, 27°30’N 92°01’E] GoogleMaps .

Type Depository. Holotype, M ( CPG); 17 Paratypes, 10 M, 7 F ( CPG, CPR, CRB).

Distribution in India. Arunachal Pradesh (Tawang District).

General Distribution. India.

Remark. The species is considered endemic to India.