Cephennodes (s. str.) brachyclavatus Jałoszyński, 2017a

Cephennodes (s. str.) brachyclavatus Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) falcipenis Jałoszyński & Nomura, 2008 View in CoL [ Thailand]

Cephennodes (s. str.) gopala Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) kotori Hoshina, 2021 View in CoL [ Japan: Kyushu]

Cephennodes (s. str.) kusunda Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) miharu Hoshina, 2021 View in CoL [ Japan: Amami Ôshima Is., Okinawa Is., Tokunoshima Is.] Cephennodes (s. str.) newar Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) oblongopunctatus Jałoszyński & Nomura, 2008 View in CoL [ Thailand]

Cephennodes (s. str.) paniporuanus Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) phulchokianus Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) pokharensis Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

Cephennodes (s. str.) sindhupalchowk Jałoszyński, 2017a View in CoL [ Nepal]

The first Chinese member of this group is described below.

The C. oblongopunctatus View in CoL group originally included one species from Thailand and eight species from Nepal ( Jałoszyński 2017a). One more species from Thailand ( C. falcipenis View in CoL ) and two species from Japan are added in the present study. The Japanese species, C. kotori (Kyushu) View in CoL and C. miharu (Ryukyus) View in CoL are highly problematic, because the illustrations of aedeagi in the original description are simplified and inaccurate (as in all Scydmaeninae-related publications of Hideto Hoshina, see critical comments in Jałoszyński (2022b; a)). According to Hoshina (2021) these species differ only in genital structures. However, it is not possible to identify these two species based on the original descriptions and illustrations, and it is not possible to make sure that C. kotori View in CoL and C. miharu View in CoL are separate species.