Quedius ( Microsaurus ) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2093 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D47B6B04-B2AD-4FDD-B7C4-B71CA6A5BB84 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7872305 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C38C875-FFB8-5B47-FE16-FBA2E1A0FCF9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Quedius ( Microsaurus ) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965 |
status |
|
Quedius ( Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965 View in CoL
Figs 2D View Fig , 6H–J View Fig
Quedius ( Microsaurus) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965: 284 View in CoL .
Diagnosis
Within the Masasatoi group, Q. piceolineatus can be recognized by the pale yellow-orange body and medial darkening on the sutural area of the elytra ( Fig. 2D View Fig ). It is most similar to Q. masasatoi but the latter species is darker, bicolored reddish to orange-yellow and dark-brown ( Fig. 5F View Fig ), with darkened parts of the abdominal tergites. Additionally, the median lobe in ventral view and paramere of Q. masasatoi ( Fig. 6K, M View Fig ) are distinctly more slender than those of Q. piceolineatus ( Fig. 6H, J View Fig ) and the apex of the median lobe in lateral view is broader in Q. masasatoi ( Fig. 6L View Fig ). Quedius masatakai is entirely dark bodied and easily distinguished from pale Q. piceolineatus .
Type material
Holotype
MYANMAR – Kachin State • ♂; “ N.E. Burma , Kambaiti; 2000 m; 14/5.1934; Malaise [printed label] / HOLOTYPUS [red handwritten label] / TYPUS Quedius piceolineatus, O. Scheerpeltz [dark red-pink label] / Quedius (Microsaurus) piceolineatus nov. spec., det. Scheerpeltz [printed label] / 6673 E91 [blue printed label] / piceolineatus Scheerpeltz [large, printed, folded label] / NHRS-JLKB 000021049 ”; NHRS.
Redescription
Rather similar to Q. masasatoi (description in Smetana 2007; supplemented by Smetana 2012a) and differing in the following: paler areas of the body in general lighter, brownish-yellow, abdominal tergites entirely pale; antennomeres 7–10 slightly less transverse but still wider than long; tergites III–IV with median impunctate area; male tergite X very similar but with slightly and minutely emarginate apex; male sternite IX similar but with expanded middle part more symmetrical and elongate basal part shorter and less elongate; median lobe in ventral view shorter and broader, pair of median teeth slightly farther apart ( Fig. 6H View Fig ), median lobe in lateral view more strongly narrowed at apex ( Fig. 6I View Fig ); paramere shorter and more strongly narrowed to apex, which is more rounded, setae on underside in slightly different arrangement ( Fig. 6J View Fig ).
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in Myanmar ( Kachin).
Bionomics
Nothing is known about the natural history of this species but the holotype has two deutonymphs of a uropodine mite attached to the pronotum ( Fig. 2D View Fig ).
Remarks
Based on the rather similar male genitalia, slightly emarginate tergite VIII and overall habitus ( Fig. 6H– M View Fig ), Q. piceolineatus is probably the sister species of Q. masasatoi .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Staphylininae |
Tribe |
Quediini |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Microsaurus |
Quedius ( Microsaurus ) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965
Brunke, Adam James 2023 |
Quedius ( Microsaurus ) piceolineatus Scheerpeltz, 1965: 284
Scheerpeltz O. 1965: 284 |