Erodium moschatum (L.)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.291971 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4368490 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/86F0E85B-C80B-A41E-D647-33C112507E8C |
treatment provided by |
Admin |
scientific name |
Erodium moschatum (L.) |
status |
|
Geranium moschatum (Linnaeus) Linnaeus View in CoL , Systema Naturae, ed. 10, 2: 1143. 1759.
"Habitat [in Anglia.]" RCN: 4964.
Basionym: Geranium cicutarium L. var. moschatum L. (1753) .
Lectotype (designated here by Aedo): Herb. Burser XVIII: 58 ( UPS) .
Current name: Erodium moschatum (L.) View in CoL L’Hér. ( Geraniaceae ).
Note: Greuter (in Candollea 44: 563, f. 2. 1989), citing Rothmaler (in Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 49: 272-281. 1940) has argued that this new combination for G. cicutarium var. moschatum L. (1753) was first made in Fl. Anglica 20. 1754. However, Stearn ( Introd. Ray’s Syn. Meth. Stirp. Brit. (Ray Soc. ed.): 56. 1973), in his analysis of names in Fl. Anglica, treated this as a repeat of Linnaeus’ use of moschatum at varietal rank from 1753. Brummitt & Meikle (in Watsonia 19: 181-183. 1993) have argued (in the context of " Primula acaulis (L.) L. ", where there is a similar situation) that there are typographical variants of the thesis which make it unreasonable to interpret this as a new combination.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Erodium moschatum (L.)
Jarvis, Charlie 2007 |