Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5618.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:949D40A8-02C1-4908-9C4E-09E885642A5A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15268423 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8E1E8782-7D35-597B-C3D6-FA2DA8FEFD7A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhipicephalus sanguineus |
status |
s.l. |
36. Rhipicephalus sanguineus View in CoL s.l. ( Latreille, 1806).
Aldama: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Bustamante: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Ciudad Madero: (4F, 3M, CNAC001998) ND, ND (Sánchez-Cordero et al. 2021; Chaires-Grijalva & Acuña-Soto 2024) 1. El Mante: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Gómez Farías: Alta Cima, C. lupus familiaris ( CONABIO 2019; Chaires-Grijalva&Acuña-Soto 2024) 1,3. Güémez:ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020; (2F, 1M) ND, C. lupus familiaris (Rodríguez-García et al. 2023) ; Hidalgo: (1F, 1M) ND, C. lupus familiaris (Rodríguez-García et al. 2023) . Llera: (2F, 1M) ND, C. lupus familiaris (Rodríguez-García et al. 2023) . Mainero: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Matamoros: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Reynosa: (IAIM001569) ND, ND ( Ponce-García 2012; Chaires-Grijalva & Acuña-Soto 2024) 1,3; ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020, Salomón et al. 2022). Río Bravo: ND, ND (CONABIO 2022; Chaires-Grijalva & Acuña-Soto 2024) 1,3; ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . San Carlos: (1F, 1M, CNAC002176) ND, ND (Sánchez- Cordero 2021; Chaires-Grijalva & Acuña-Soto 2024) 1, 2,3; (5F, 2M) ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020, Rodríguez-García et al. 2023); (1F, 1M, CNAC002179) ND, ND. San Fernando: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) ; (5F, 3M) ND, C. lupus familiaris (Rodríguez-García et al. 2023) . Soto la Marina: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Tampico: (8F, 3M CNAC002178) ND, ND (Sánchez-Cordero 2021; Chaires-Grijalva & Acuña-Soto 2024) 1, 2, 3; ND, C. lupus familiaris (Hoffmann, 1962) . Tula: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) . Victoria: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) ; (4F, 2M) Cd. Victoria, C. lupus familiaris (Rodríguez-García et al. 2023) ; (IAIM001926) Cd. Victoria, ND ( Ponce-García 2012; Chaires-Grijalva & Acuña-Soto 2024) 1; Cd. Victoria, ND ( Almazán et al. 2023); (79F, 33M, LAFC000485) Ejido Santa Ana, Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque) , Ejido Santa Ana, C. lupus familiaris (Present study). Villagrán: ND, C. lupus familiaris ( Merino et al. 2020) .
Distribution: Tamaulipas Province, Veracruzan Province, Chihuahuan Desert Province, and Sierra Madre Oriental Province.
Note: Rhipicephalus sanguineus is a complex of approximately 12 species distributed worldwide ( Dantas-Torres et al. 2013; Šlapeta et al. 2021); in America there are currently two species, i.e. Rhipicephalus sanguineus s.s. (“temperate lineage”) ( Nava et al. 2018) and Rhipicephalus linnaei (“tropical lineage”) ( Šlapeta et al. 2022). Both species have been reported in Mexico; however, until now R. sanguineus s.s. has been found in the northern states of Chihuahua and Sonora, in sympatry with R. linnaei (Sánchez-Montes et al. 2021; Almazán et al. 2023; Moo-Llanes et al., 2023). Except for the record from Ejido Santa Ana, most of the records were taken from literature, so new collections and new morphological and molecular studies are necessary to determine whether only one or both species are distributed in the state of Tamaulipas.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SuperOrder |
Parasitiformes |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |