Encalypta rhaptocarpa, Schwaegrichen, 1811

Ignatov, Michael S., Spirina, Ulyana N., Kolesnikova, Maria A., Ashikhmina, Darya A., Ignatova, Elena A. & Polevova, Svetlana V., 2018, Peristome development pattern in Encalypta poses a problem: what is the primary peristomial layer in mosses?, Arctoa 27 (1), pp. 1-17 : 4

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.15298/arctoa.27.01

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15442121

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A012AD30-FFAD-FFAC-FC90-4DEC5E8C27E7

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Encalypta rhaptocarpa
status

 

Encalypta rhaptocarpa View in CoL ( Fig. 5 View Fig : A–I).

The studied sequence of divisions results in a pattern characterised by the following formulae: 2:1 — 2:2:1— 4:2:2 — 8:4:2:2 — 8:4:4:2. The IPL:PPL cells thickness ratio varies from 3:1 to 1.2: 1 in different series and at different stages. Anticlinal divisions are numerous at later stages of development in both IPL and PPL ( Fig. 5 H, I View Fig ), and occasionally periclinal divisions occur in IPL at the level of proximal part of teeth. In later (lower in the series) stages, cell walls from different layers are quite perfectly aligned, while in a medium stage, 4:2:2, the aligning is only moderately perfect, and in one sector 4:2:3 pattern is seen. Being solitary, it could be considered as an exception, however in another sector the cell wall is also quite offset ( Fig. 5E View Fig , arrowed).

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Bryophyta

Class

Bryopsida

Order

Pottiales

Family

Encalyptaceae

Genus

Encalypta

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF