Veronica ornata Monjuschko, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/adansonia2025v47a7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15261828 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B534878F-B252-FF86-FE99-FBAC0A54FB43 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Veronica ornata Monjuschko |
status |
|
Veronica ornata Monjuschko View in CoL
Botanicheskie materialy Gerbariya glavnogo botaniczeskogo Sada 5: 120 ( Monjuschko 1924). — Pseudolysimachion ornatum (Monjuschko) Holub View in CoL , Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 2: 425 ( Holub & Pouzar 1967).
TYPE CITATION. — Japan: “In silvaticis regionis montanae”.
LECTOTYPE. — Designated by Elenevsky (1978): 110): “ Savatier no. 902 ”, LE .
ISOLECTOTYPES (designated here). — P[ P03529498 *, P03529514 *].
Nomenclatural note. When publishing the name V. ornata, Monjuschko (1924) mentioned five specimens examined, one specimen by Savatier (“ no. 902. Hakone, in rupibus fruticetis. 1866-1871. A. Franchet (sub nom. V. incana L.”), two by Maximowicz and two from Siebold. It is not clear whether his comment “ex Mus. Bot. Acad. Scient. Petrop.” refers just to the Siebold specimens or all five. The Paris specimens of Savatier no. 902 are unlikely to have been inspected since they are labeled “in jugo Hakone” (P03429514) and “in tractu Hakone” (P03529498 from Drake herbarium).It appears that rather Franchet sent an additional specimen to St. Petersburg, which was seen by Elenevsky (1978) and chosen as lectotype.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Veronica ornata Monjuschko
Albach, Dirk C. 2025 |
Pseudolysimachion ornatum (Monjuschko)
Botanicheskie materialy Gerbariya glavnogo botaniczeskogo Sada 5: 120 ( Monjuschko 1924 ). |
Pseudolysimachion ornatum (Monjuschko) Holub , Folia Geobotanica Phytotaxonomica 2: 425 ( Holub & Pouzar 1967 ). |