Veronica crassifolia Wierzb.ex Heuff.
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5252/adansonia2025v47a7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15237941 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B534878F-B269-FFBD-FC18-FE2E0CEDF940 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Veronica crassifolia Wierzb.ex Heuff. |
status |
|
Veronica crassifolia Wierzb.ex Heuff. View in CoL
Flora 18: 251 ( Heuffel 1835), nom. illeg. (Art. 53.1; non V. crassifolia Kit. ex Roem. & Schult. View in CoL ). — V. barrelieri subsp. prodanii (Degen) Albach View in CoL , Taxon 57: 3 ( Albach 2008a).
TYPE CITATION. — Romania, Caras-Severin: “Hab. in lapidosis rupestribusque calcareis (an Kalkfelsen) montis Szimcon (Simion) ad Csiklovan [Ciclova Montana] in Banatu. Aestate”.
LECTOTYPE. — Designated byAlbach et al. (2017), BP[ BP149668 !].
SYNTYPES. — Collected at the type locality in 1834: M[ M0188509!* ], P[ P03516860* ].
Nomenclatural note. I have discussed the taxonomic problems of V. crassifolia previously ( Albach et al. 2017). The name was published in 1835 with most specimens in European herbaria dating from 1835 or without date, which excludes them from consideration as lectotype.The lectotype in BP is dated from1833, so specimens from 1834 can be considered syntypes since they are not the same collection even if they are from the same locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Veronica crassifolia Wierzb.ex Heuff.
Albach, Dirk C. 2025 |
V. crassifolia Kit. ex
1835: 251 |