Chalarus delicatus Rafael, 1990
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2023.024 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B94E1D89-5827-404D-821F-2DA8339FFB58 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10621490 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C00B8781-CC07-F150-5820-5CAF248412FF |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chalarus delicatus Rafael, 1990 |
status |
|
Chalarus delicatus Rafael, 1990 View in CoL
( Figs 44–54 View Figs 44–54 , 55 View Fig )
Chalarus delicatus Rafael, 1990: 49 View in CoL , Figs 7–9 View Figs 1–11 .
Chalarus delicatus View in CoL : JERVIS (1992:346); DE MEYER (1996:15); KEHLMAIER & ASSMANN (2010: 12); RODRÍGUEZ & RAFAEL (2012: 17).
Chalarus spuruius : HARDY (1965): 2 (partim).
Material examined (1 J). COLOMBIA, Caquetá, San José del Fragua, / Vda. [Vereda] Bellavista, Fca.[Finca] Mi Ranchito, / 01º18’23’’N / 76º00’33’’W, 265 m [eters], / 29.Mar[ III] –12.Abr[ IV].2017, / trampa Malaise en dosel del bosque, / Y. Ramos-Pastrana ( LEUA – 00000049809) (photographed specimen).
Diagnosis. Pedicel with four setae dorsally and two ventrally. Hind tibia with 1–2 strong setae medially. Both surstyli with outer margins slightly curved; inner margin of each surstylus forming an angle of approximately 130º centrally, apices truncated and converging, without sinus at junction with epandrium in lateral view. Gonopods with apices rounded; left gonopod with apex slightly thinner than right one. Tip of distiphallus short and acute, without phallic processes. Phallus trifid, one ejaculatory duct apically, the other two medially and forward-directed in ventral view, not visible in dorsal view.
Intraspecific variability. RAFAEL (1990) provided a complete description and illustrations of the Brazilian holotype; however, we found variations in the Colombian material. Therefore, we provide a comparison of the variations between the Colombian and Brazilian specimens (between parenthesis, when comparable).
Male. Head ( Figs 44–45 View Figs 44–54 ). Occiput dark brown, gray-brown pruinose. Antenna ( Fig. 46 View Figs 44–54 ) brown ( versus antenna dark brown to black in the holotype); pedicel with four setae dorsally and two ventrally. Thorax ( Figs 45, 47 View Figs 44–54 ). Postpronotal lobe brown, gray-brown pruinose. Scutum dark brown, gray-brown pruinose ( versus scutum black, brown pruinose). Notopleuron and scutellum concolorous with scutum. Mesopleuron brown, gray-brown pruinose. Mediotergite concolorous with mesopleuron. Wing ( Fig. 48 View Figs 44–54 ). Membrane slightly infuscated. Legs ( Fig. 44 View Figs 44–54 ) entirely brown, except tarsomeres 1–4 light brown ( versus legs black, except femoro-tibial articulations and all tarsomeres light brown); pulvilli light brown. Abdomen ( Figs 45, 49 View Figs 44–54 ) brown, gray-brown pruinose, with long setae laterally and short scattered setae dorsally; tergite 1 light brown basally, dark brown posterolaterally; tergite 1–5 with transverse bands brown pruinose dorsally; tergite 6 clearly shorter than tergite 5; syntergosternite 8 with long apical setae (Fig. X). Terminalia ( Figs 50–54 View Figs 44–54 ). Epandrium and surstyli brown ( Fig. 50 View Figs 44–54 ). Surstyli ( Figs 50–52 View Figs 44–54 ) subsymmetrical and setose, with long seta apically; both surstyli with outer margins slightly curved, inner margin of each surstylus forming angle of approximately 130º centrally, apices truncated and converging ( Fig. 50 View Figs 44–54 ); both surstyli with apices rounded; left surstylus in lateral view with apex slightly thinner than right one ( Figs 51–52 View Figs 44–54 ). Gonopods subsymmetrical; left gonopod with apex slightly thinner than right one ( Figs 51–52 View Figs 44–54 ). Tip of distiphallus short with tip acute ( Fig. 53A View Figs 44–54 ). Ejaculatory apodeme pin-shaped ( Fig. 54 View Figs 44–54 ). Phallus trifid, one ejaculatory duct apically, the other two medially and forward-directed in ventral view, not visible in dorsal view ( Figs 53A–B View Figs 44–54 ).
Habitat. The specimen was collected in the canopy in preserved areas of tropical rainforest in the Colombian Amazon, Department of Caquetá.
Geographical distribution. Brazil ( São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina) ( RAFAEL 1990), Colombia ( Caquetá) (new record) ( Fig. 55 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chalarus delicatus Rafael, 1990
Ramos-Pastrana, Yardany, Marques, Dayse Willkenia A. & Rafael, José Albertino 2023 |
Chalarus delicatus
KEHLMAIER C. & ASSMANN T. 2010: 12 |
DE MEYER M. 1996: 15 |
JERVIS M. A. 1992: 346 |
Chalarus delicatus
RAFAEL J. A. 1990: 49 |
Chalarus spuruius
HARDY D. E. 1965: 2 |