Rhodnius domesticus Neiva & Pinto, 1923
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-4689.v41.e24006 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2EB17AC1-901B-483D-9752-3574A681A1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14703632 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C7230F65-FF90-FFEF-F6EA-B2614419FA7A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Rhodnius domesticus Neiva & Pinto, 1923 |
status |
|
Rhodnius domesticus Neiva & Pinto, 1923 View in CoL
Distribution. Alagoas, Bahia, EspÍrito Santo, Maranhão, Minas Gerais, Paraná, PiauÍ, Rio de Janeiro, Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Sergipe (this occurrence was recorded for R. zeledoni , currently a synonym of R. domesticus – Oliveira-Correia et al. 2024).
Public health importance. Although its name could suggest that it would be a domestic species, it is sylvatic and has been found in human habitations only in isolated instances. Free-living populations have been found mainly in rodent or marsupial nests in epiphytic bromeliads, and occasionally in hollow trees ( Lent and Wygodzinsky 1979, Guarneri et al. 1998). It has been found naturally infected with T. cruzi and T. rangeli , but of less importance as a vector ( Corrêa-do-Nascimento et al. 2020).
Remarks. The life cycle of this species has been studied in the laboratory by Guarneri et al. (1998).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |