Hydrobioides Nevill, 1885
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.101.143936 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C0F8018F-646D-491E-A749-715896CBF713 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15079015 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C9A053D8-F410-5B3F-A014-727225FFE0EC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Hydrobioides Nevill, 1885 |
status |
|
Hydrobioides Nevill, 1885 View in CoL
Hydrobioides Nevill, 1885: 42. View in CoL
Paranerita Annandale, 1920: 4 View in CoL .
Parabithynia Pilsbry, 1928 View in CoL , syn. nov.: 108.
Bithynia (Parabithynia) – Popova et al. 1970: 95.
Type species.
Fairbankia turrita Blanford, 1869 (original designation; Myanmar, Irrawaddy River, “ Kyoukpong ”).
Diagnosis.
Shell medium for the family, solid, aperture lip thickened, outer lip outward extended; penial appendix located in the central of penis, penial appendix slightly shorter than distal part of penis.
Remarks.
According to Molluscabase (2024 a), there are six extant valid species assigned to this genus; five species are described from Myanmar, and one species is described from Laos. The type species of this genus is Hydrobioides turrita ( Blanford, 1869) with high spiral whorls and an extremely outward extended outer lip (Fig. 3 P View Figure 3 ); its type locality is “ Kyoukpong ” near the Irrawaddy River in Myanmar (probably referring to Kyouk Pon near Bagan in the Mandalay Region), and it was also collected from Heho near the Inle Lake basin as subfossils ( Annandale 1918). However, this species has never been collected again since Annandale (1918). Based on shell characters of Hydrobioides turrita , we consider that the outward extended outer lip is the most important morphological diagnosis character for this genus. Hydrobioides nassa is always considered widely distributed in north to central Thailand, but we consider that the Thai population should be another species (see in remarks of Hydrobioides nassa ). We consider that Parabithynia Pilsbry, 1928 , should be a synonym of Hydrobioides (see in remarks of Hydrobioides physcus ). The molecular study based on 16 S and COI does not support Hydrobioides as a monophyletic group (Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ). The taxonomy of this genus needs systematic revision.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Mysorellinae |
Hydrobioides Nevill, 1885
Zhang, Le-Jia, Shu, Shu-Sen, Song, Xin-Yuan, Naing, Nay Htet, Oo, Thaung Naing & Chen, Xiao-Yong 2025 |
Bithynia (Parabithynia)
Popova SM & Devyatkin YV & Starobogatov YI 1970: 95 |
Hydrobioides
Nevill G 1885: 42 |
Paranerita
Paranerita Annandale, 1920: 4 . |
Parabithynia
Parabithynia Pilsbry, 1928 |