Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5673.4.2 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BDB672BD-A778-4CE7-BCC4-75A1A0A67A2B |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16982299 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD27F765-4909-675A-FF0D-C9C6F41CFEEB |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894 |
| status |
|
15. Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894
Original combination
Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894: 383–385 .
Current combination
Paralabella lutea ( de Bormans, 1894) — Steinmann, 1989: 583–584.
Type material
Syntype ( 1 female; dried, on cardboard) MYANMAR • 1 ♀ (Fig. 52); “Sphongophora / lutea Borm. / sp. n. // Kotype // Paratypoid // Carin Ghecù / 1300–1400 m / L. Fea V.88 // Birma / Leon. Fea leg. / vend. 1.1.1895. // A. de Bormans / determ. // ZMH 76581 ”
Type locality
Carin Ghecú, Carin Chebà & Carin Asciuii Chebà [ Myanmar].
Current status
Valid species.
Remarks
The original species name should actually be Spongiphora lutea , as de Bormans (1894) seems to have misspelled the genus. Furthermore, it seems like a wrong collection date (May instead of March) is written on the specimen label. As this particular information was added in writing on the otherwise printed label it might be a mistake.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Labiinae |
|
Genus |
Spongophora lutea de Bormans, 1894
| Nguyen, Eileen, Matzke, Danilo, Federspiel, Miriam, Peters, Carolin & Husemann, Martin 2025 |
Spongophora lutea
| de Bormans, A. 1894: 385 |