Hypertrocta posticalis (Walker, 1866)
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5635.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2AE5CFBD-7E55-410F-B6C2-C749FA6A4AF0 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D72A813D-0916-3109-8A8A-FF2835C5FDD8 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Hypertrocta posticalis |
| status |
|
122. Hypertrocta posticalis View in CoL (Walker, [1866] 1865): 1200 ( Moscha )
TL: Hindostan
= Hypertrocta marmorata Hampson, 1893: 32 View in CoL (TL: Ceylon, Nawala-pittia)
Distribution: India (South India, Kerala), Sri Lanka, Borneo, Malaysia.
Genus Hyposada Hampson, 1910 [August]: 412
TS: Phibalapteryx hydrocampata Guenée , in Boisduval & Guenée, 1857: 438, by monotypy.
= Hyposada Hampson, 1910 View in CoL [December]: xi, 273 (TS: Lycauges postvittata Moore, 1887: 456 ). Hyposada Hampson, 1910 View in CoL [December] is a junior homonym of Hyposada Hampson, 1910 View in CoL [August]. The latter was used and unintentionally made available by Hampson in August, prior to its proposal and generic description by Hampson in December for the same concept, but having a different type species. There is no objective replacement name but L. postvittata is congeneric with P. hydrocampata Guenée, 1857 , the type species of Hyposada Hampson, 1910 View in CoL [August]. The latter is therefore available for use as a subjective replacement name ( Nye 1975).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Hypertrocta posticalis
| Joshi, Rahul, Zahiri, Reza, Banerjee, Diya & Singh, Navneet 2025 |
Hypertrocta marmorata
| Hampson, G. F. 1893: 32 |