Rhinotridens britskii, de Pinna, Reis,Pastana & Datovo, 2024

Rhinotridens britskii , new species urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:D5BECFB8-032B-4A41-B367-A9F5D3992D4E

( Figs. 1–10 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 ; Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 )

Holotype. ZUEC 18281 , 15.2 mm SL; Brazil, Amazonas State, Atalaia do Norte Municipality, rio Amazonas basin , rio Javari drainage , rio Itacoaí subdrainage (sometimes called Itacoari or Itaquaí) , igarapé Boa Vista, upstream from mouth of rio Queixito , 04°26’37”S 70°14’11”W, 15 Nov 2017, F. C. T. Lima, C. R. Moreira, G. N. Salvador & N. Flausino Jr. GoogleMaps

Paratypes. Brazil, Amazonas State. MNRJ 55570 , 7 eth (14.4–15.8 mm SL), same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; MZUSP 129867 , 8 eth, 2 c&s (13.0– 14.8 mm SL), same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; MZUSP 36302 , 11 eth, 4 c&s, 1 sem (12.7–13.8 mm SL), lago Buiuçu , Ati-Paraná, NW of Fonte Boa , ca. 01°51’S 65°37’W, 11–12 Oct 1968, EPA; GoogleMaps MZUSP 23449 , 1 eth (15.7 mm SL), lago Mari-Mari , Ati-Paraná, NW of Fonte Boa , 01°51’58.36”S 66°41’0.65”W, 14 Oct 1968, EPA; GoogleMaps ZUEC 15118 , 27 eth, 4 c&s (14.7–16.9 mm SL), same data as holotype GoogleMaps .

Non-types. MCZ 52186 , 4 eth, 1 c&s (disarticulated) (14.1–15.3 mm SL), Colombia, Loreto , Río Loreto-Yacco [= Río Loretoyaco], ca. 03°30’S 70°10’W, Nov 1976, C. Navarro; GoogleMaps MZUSP 72977 , 1 eth (14.8 mm SL), Brazil, Amazonas State, rio Madeira , unnamed igarapé 15 km from Humaitá , ca. 07°30’S 63°02’W, 7 Aug 1984, M. Goulding. GoogleMaps MZUSP 121256 , 1 eth (15.2 mm SL), 14.5 mm SL, Peru, main channel of Río Yanayacu , Río Yana drainage, 03°24’05.2”S 72°04’19.4”W, 21 Oct 2014, M. Toledo-Piza et al GoogleMaps .

Diagnosis. The new species differs from its single congener, Rhinotridens chromocaudatus, by the caudal fin mostly hyaline, with only a few uniformly scattered dark melanophores not forming any particular pattern ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; vs. chromatophores forming a conspicuous horizontal dark stripe in the middle of the caudal fin); by the rictal barbel externally vestigial or absent ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , where it is externally invisible; vs. clearly visible externally); by the anal fin with 22–29 segmented rays (vs. 17–20); by the interorbital distance larger than eye diameter ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ; vs. equal); by the lateral process of the autopalatine positioned close to the anterior margin of the bone, and with a broad base, straight evenly narrowing to tip ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ; vs. process positioned at middle of the bone, anteriorly curved and of roughly even width); by the lack of lower pharyngeal dentition ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ; vs. two teeth present on ceratobranchial 5); and by the mostly straight orbitosphenoid, parallel to longitudinal axis of skull ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ; vs. curved laterally).

Description. Morphometric data for holotype and paratypes given in Tab. 1 View TABLE 1 . Body elongate, deeper than wide at pectoral-fin insertion and progressively more compressed towards caudal peduncle ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Dorsal profile gently convex from nape to dorsal fin and gently concave or straight from that point to middle of caudal peduncle, then convex again along region of procurrent caudal-fin rays. Ventral profile of body straight to gently convex along cardiac region, then gently convex or straight to anal-fin origin, straight along anal-fin base and convex along posterior half of caudal peduncle. Anal opening immediately anterior to anal-fin origin. Greatest body depth variable, at region ranging from vertical through pelvic-fin base to anus.

Head depressed, longer than wide. Snout with semicircular anteromedial protrusion particularly evident in dorsal and ventral views ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 ). Anterior nostril small, directed anterolaterally, positioned at margin of head at junction between central protrusion of snout and rest of head, surrounded by short tube of integument ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Anterior nostril more exposed in ventral than in dorsal view. Nasal barbel absent. Posterior nostril round, smaller than anterior one and positioned dorsally on head, slightly closer to anterior nostril than to anterior margin of eye. Posterior nostril lacking tube or rim of integument, extended posteriorly by gently and narrow hydrodynamic ridge. Posterior internarial width smaller than interorbital. Mouth ventral, crescent-shaped, its corners directed posteriorly or even slightly converging towards midline in ventral view. Upper lip thick, its posterior margin gently round, with curvature accentuated centrally and continuous posteriorly with maxillary barbel ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Lower lip wider than upper one, subdivided into poorly-defined bilateral lobes slanted posteriorly, with anterior margin straight or slightly convex (or with strong central concavity in some specimens, presumably depending on muscle contraction upon fixation). Upper and lower lips continuous via narrow integumentary connection posteriorly. Maxillary barbel reaching anterior half to middle of eyeball. Rictal barbel either vestigial (visible externally as small protrusion in lower lip flap integument), or externally absent (totally embedded in lower lip flap integument, as in specimen in Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Internal cores of both barbels well developed, as visible in skeletal preparations stained for cartilage ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Eyes extremely large and round, covered with thin translucent skin not adhered to eyeball’s surface. Eyes located laterally on head, at middle of HL and fully visible in both dorsal and ventral views ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Interorbital space larger than eye diameter. Greatest head width at transverse line through posterior margin of eyes. Opercular odontodophore ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) small and semicircular at free posterior margin, fully visible in lateral view (in profile in dorsal view) and located immediately dorsal to pectoral-fin base, with 3 exposed conical odontodes. Interopercular odontodophore ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ) semicircular, twice as large as opercular one, fully visible in both lateral and ventral views and positioned immediately anterior to pectoral-fin base, with 5 exposed conical odontodes. Opercular and interopercular odontodophores not juxtaposed, instead well separated by space equivalent minimally to diameter of former ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). Branchiostegal membrane forming free fold ventrally across isthmus, its posterior margin gently sinusoid, broadly concave medially ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Cephalic latero-sensory system pores four on each side of head ( Figs. 2B–C View FIGURE 2 ). Posterior one (L1, visible clearly in Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 , and faintly in profile in Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ) positioned dorsomesially to opercular odontodophore; second pore (prec, visible clearly in Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ) laterallyoriented, horizontally aligned with middle of opercular odontodophore and vertically aligned with middle of interopercular odontodophore; third one (infc, visible in Figs. 2A–B View FIGURE 2 , right side) approximately midway between posterior margin of eye and base of opercular odontodophore, fourth and anterior-most pore (s3, visible in Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 , right side) closer to dorsal midline than all others, positioned approximately at transverse line through posterior third of eyes. Lateral-line short, reduced to short branch extending posteriorly from area of posterior margin of opercular odontodophore, with one laterallyoriented pore approximately at midlength of canal ( Figs. 2–6 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 ), and posterior terminal pore, posteroventrally-bent, positioned at vertical through middle of pectoral fin ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Axillary gland large and tumescent in some specimens, surrounding pectoral-fin base on all sides except anteriorly, extending posteriorly to almost margin of pectoral fin ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ) and opening posteriorly as a large slit-like pore (not visible in illustrations). Gland small and inconspicuous in some other specimens.

Pectoral fin small, ca. 40–45% of HL, its rays similar in length, forming slightly convex distal margin ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Pectoral-fin rays i,4(18*), i,3(3) or ii,1,i(1), count asymmetrical in three specimens (one of which holotype, with i,4 on right side and i,5 on left side; first ray distally branched on one side of few specimens), first ray not prolonged as filament. Pelvic fin small ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), located on anterior half of SL, distant from anal-fin base by distance equivalent to pelvic fin length or slightly more. Pelvic-fin rays i,4(20*) ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ), with last ray sometimes not branched or only incipiently branched. Pelvic splint absent ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). Dorsal fin with distal margin gently convex, its origin slightly posterior to that of anal fin ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Dorsal-fin rays vii(2), viii(18*), or ix(1), with second to fourth rays incipiently branched in some specimens. Anal fin long ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ), with distal margin strait to slight concave, posteriorly adjacent to area of lower procurrent caudal-fin rays. Anal-fin rays xxii(1), xxiii(3), xxiv(4), xxv(4), xxvi(5*), xxviii(1) or xxix(2), plus one procurrent ray. Caudal fin shallowly emarginate, with upper lobe slightly longer than lower one. Caudal-fin rays 6/6(1), 6/7(18*), 6/8(1) or 7/8(1). Procurrent caudal-fin rays 7–10 dorsally and 7–12 ventrally.

Neurocranium. Skull roof mostly unossified, forming single large fontanel bordered by mesethmoid, frontal, sphenotic-prootic-pterosphenoid, and parieto-supraoccipital ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Mesethmoid formed by thin lamina of bone, T-shaped in dorsal view, with broad central shaft, connected to anterior, cornua-bearing portion by extremely thin hinge-like sheet of bone bent 90° ventrally (visible only faintly in Fig. 5A View FIGURE 5 ). Distal part of cornua strongly bent ventrolaterally, its tip slightly bent posteriorly. Mesethmoid stem covered posterodorsally by anterior part of frontals. Frontal elongate, its posterior two-thirds rod-like, forming narrow rim at dorsolateral margin of neurocranium ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Its anterior third expanded and chisel-like, meeting its antimere sagittally. Sphenotic, prootic, and pterosphenoid fused. Portion corresponding to sphenotic very narrow anteriorly, matching in shape (and connected to) posterior end of frontal. Parieto-supraoccipital with curved anterolateral projections bordering posterolateral portion of cranial fontanel. Pterotic with small lateral process. Vomer large, roughly hourglassshaped, forming most prominent element at ventral aspect of ethmoid region. Anterior end of vomer flared and truncate, ending immediately posterior to base of mesethmoid cornua and with small anterolateral process on each side, contacting base of mesethmoid cornua ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Posterior part of vomer expanded and split into three large processes. Median process longest, with round distal end, overlapping ventrally central part of parasphenoid. Lateral arms shorter, pointed and claw-like, ventrally overlapping most of lateral ethmoid. Midlength of vomer with lateral thickening forming facet for articulation with autopalatine. Lateral ethmoids small and simplified, restricted to neurocranial floor, straight in ventral aspect, converging anteriorly towards midline and separated from each other by anterior part of parasphenoid ( Figs. 5B, C View FIGURE 5 ). Lateral ethmoid connected by cartilage with anterior end of orbitosphenoid posteriorly and with ethmoid cartilage anteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Orbitosphenoid rod-like, straight, or gently sigmoid, lacking foramina, and restricted to neurocranial floor. Parasphenoid broad and laminar, suspended mostly on soft tissue of the skull floor, free from surrounding bones except anteriorly with vomer and posteriorly with prootic symphysis ( Figs. 5B, C View FIGURE 5 ). Basioccipital lacking anterior processes and not sutured to parasphenoid. Latero-sensory canal enclosed by bone in supracleithrum and pterotic, extending anteriorly to that point in soft tissue only, alongside sphenotic and most of frontal, diverging laterally from skull margin anteriorly and ending at pore slightly posterior to anterior margin of eye.

Jaws. Premaxilla large, with general claw-like shape in dorsal view, with long recess along distal two-thirds of posterior margin tapering distally, and with conspicuous anteromedial ascending process articulating with posterior margin of mesethmoid cornua ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Premaxillary teeth disposed in three arched rows implanted on bone (with 29, 32, and 26 teeth each, anterior to posterior), plus three additional rows of labial teeth (with 5, 11–12, and 20 teeth each, anterior to posterior) attached to upperlip connective tissue just anterior to premaxilla, in arrangement continuous with that of bone-attached dentition ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Posteromedial margin of premaxilla protruded, bearing conspicuously independent dentition, with 5–6 teeth disposed in semicircle ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Maxilla small, paralleling concave posterior profile of premaxilla and distally supporting internal cores of maxillary and rictal barbels, proximally with finger-like articular process hinged on anterior margin of distal portion of anterior autopalatine cartilage ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Lower jaw heavily ossified, much wider (transversely) than long (longitudinally). Articulation with quadrate modified into posteromedially-directed process attached nearly at middle of lower jaw, formed mostly by compound articular (= angulo-articulo-retroarticular). Coronoid process possible represented by small process distal to that articulation. Dentary with numerous teeth arranged in five well-defined rows (visible in straight view against toothed surface) disposed in curved files oblique to longest axis of lower jaw, with 4–6, 10–11, 16, 17–18, and 17–18 teeth). Teeth at symphysis more mesially-oriented than remainder of dentary dentition, apparently providing counterpart to offset premaxillary dentition dorsally. Meckel’s cartilage small and located just ventral to the last row of dentary teeth. Coronomeckelian bone absent.

Suspensorium and opercular series. Autopalatine asymmetrically stellate in general aspect, with hypertrophied lateral process pointed and directed straight laterally, its anterior margin slightly posterior transversely to anterior margin of main body of bone ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Anterior autopalatine cartilage elongated laterally, originating on anterior surface of main body of bone and extending laterally alongside anterior margin of lateral process, closely positioned to latter but unattached to it. Mesial process of autopalatine thick and broad-based, forming articulation with neurocranium via vomer. Deep concave recess anteromesially between main body of autopalatine and mesial process, matching area of posteromesial offset tooth platform of premaxilla (see above). Posterior autopalatine process long and thin, with no distal cartilage, curved ventrally towards ascending process of quadrate but not contacting it, instead ligamentously connected with anterodorsal process of hyomandibula. Quadrate with anterior portion laminar and posterior portion elongate, its ascending process with large cartilage plug fitting into anterior recess on anterodorsal hyomandibular process ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Metapterygoid absent. Hyomandibula with large distal process directed anterodorsally, split into unequal-sized branches, larger one spike-like and pointed, smaller one truncated. Dorsal margin of hyomandibula with pointed protrusion approximately at its midlength ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Hyomandibula with triple link with skull: by small cartilage plug articulating at pterotic-sphenotic cartilage limit, by short ligament (originating on ventral surface of pterotic and inserted on posterodorsal hyomandibular process immediately posterior to cartilage articulation) and by direct bony link with ventral part of sphenotic. Preopercle with anterior half narrow, pointed and curved dorsally. Small ventral condyle present for articulation with interopercle. Interopercle short, with dorsal concavity for articulation with opercle and odontodophore bearing five similar-sized odontodes in single row. Opercle with considerable laminar area, conspicuous adductor crest, and well-defined dilatator process positioned immediately dorsal to large articular facet with hyomandibula. Opercular odontodophore compact, with four clustered odontodes. Anteroventral process of opercle short, laminar, and broad in lateral view.

Hyoid bar. Urohyal with short and thin lateral arms not reaching branchiostegals, short posterior process, and hyoid foramen widely variable in size ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Ventral (and only) hypohyal with large ventral fovea for articulation with blunt urohyal condyles. Anterior ceratohyal straight, flattened at articular extremities, their planes oriented orthogonally relative to each other. Posterior ceratohyal short and conical. Interhyal absent. Branchiostegals six, increasing only slightly in length posteriorly. Three branchiostegals articulating with anterior ceratohyal, two with posterior ceratohyal and one with intervening cartilage.

Gill arches. Basibranchials and hypobranchials completely cartilaginous ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Basibranchials 2 and 3 slender, conjoined in elongate anterior copula; basibranchial 4 short, nearly as broad as long, roughly hexagonal, sometimes preceded by spurious cartilage bodies resembling accessory basibranchial elements (such as specimen illustrated in Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Hypobranchials 1 and 2 rod-like, their main axis oblique relative to longitudinal axis, more strongly so in latter. Hypobranchial 3 largest of series, complexshaped and angulate, its main axis nearly parallel to longitudinal axis. Ceratobranchials ossified at middle portion, cartilaginous distally to tips. Ceratobranchials 1–4 with variably-shaped laminar projections; ceratobranchial 5 shorter and simpler in shape than rest of series, lacking teeth entirely (i.e., lower pharyngeal dentition absent). Epibranchials 1–3 thinly ossified at middle portion, cartilaginous distally to tips. Epibranchial 1 with small anterodorsal uncinate process; epibranchials 2 and 3 slender, rod-like, latter articulating with anterior half of pharyngobranchial 3; epibranchial 4 wider and more densely ossified than others, articulating with posterior half of upper pharyngeal toothplate. Pharyngobranchial 4 cartilaginous, long, and rod-like, adpressed to large curved upper pharyngeal toothplate bearing four to six large teeth. Pharyngobranchial 3 represented by small independent cartilage immediately anterior to and aligned with pharyngobranchial 4 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). Gill rakers absent.

Axial skeleton and median-fins supports. Weberian apparatus encapsulated with narrow lateral opening with short neck-like extension ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Post-Weberian vertebrae 36(4), 37(3), or 39(1). First post-Weberian vertebra nearly half length of subsequent one. First complete haemal arch and spine on third post-Weberian vertebrae. Pleural ribs two, second pair smaller than first (vestigial in some specimens) and not contacting parapophyses. Dorsal-fin basal radials 8(6) or 9(2), first one posterior to hemal spine of post-Weberian vertebra 20(6) or 21(2). Anal-fin basal radials 27(4) or 29(2), first one posterior to hemal spine post-Weberian vertebra 15(3) or 16(5). Distal heads of first and second anal-fin radials expanded, at least twice as broad as those of subsequent elements. Hypural complex composed of two roughly triangular plates, lower one (supposed to represent fused parhypural and hypurals 1–2) larger in area than upper one (presumably formed by fused hypurals 3–5). Urostyle continuous with compound caudal centrum (PU1+U1), its basal half adpressed to dorsal margin of upper hypural plate and its distal half separated from latter by narrow gap. Epurals absent.

Paired girdles. Posttemporo-supracleithrum tightly articulated with neurocranium ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Cleithrum continuously ossified only at margins, with middle portion either totally unossified or ossified fragmentarily ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Posterior margin of cleithrum with well-defined articular surface for anteroventral surface of Weberian capsule. Scapulocoracoid elongate and cylindrical, mineralized only at base in most specimens (in one specimen ossified entirely), distally supporting first proximal radial and first pectoral-fin ray ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). First proximal radial reduced to a rod-like cartilaginous structure. Second proximal pectoral radial, distally flared (fan-shaped), mostly cartilaginous (with thin sheath of ossification, more heavily proximally) ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ). Basipterygia mostly cartilaginous, fused sagittally, with poorly mineralized ossification and two anterior arms broadly fused at base ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ). External arms directed straight anteriorly or anterolaterally, internal arms converging towards midline to meet at midline, in most specimens fusing into median process directed anteriorly. Various minor deformities/ polymorphism in basipterygial morphology. Single specimen in ZUEC 15118 with more heavily mineralized basipterygia. Intervening cartilage remains continuous in that specimen. Pelvic splint absent.

Coloration in alcohol. Head with dense covering of dark chromatophores on dorsal and lateral surfaces of snout, extending posteriorly along margins of braincase ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). Central portion of braincase (corresponding mostly to hypertrophied cranial fontanel) uniformly dark with dense brain pigment, medially delimiting striking white pupil chromatically simulating pseudo-fontanel (actual fontanel not corresponding to white shape). Dark pigment of head extending ventrolaterally to cheeks and region around base of pectoral fin. Dark irregular concentrations on bases of odontodophores. Narrow dark markings regularly arranged between individual odontodes (most pronouncedly on interopercular odontodophore). Ventral surface of head mostly white, except for anterior portion of snout and occasional random spots in some specimens. Lips and maxillary barbels white. Entire dorsum densely covered with dark chromatophores, laterally disposed in poorly-defined file, extending onto dorsal margin of caudal peduncle as row of dark spots. Entire length of longitudinal skeletogenous septum outlined with thin row of dark chromatophores, all the way to base of hypural plate, forming conspicuous midlateral stripe. Thin broken lines of dark chromatophores faintly outlining limits of anterior epaxial myotomes. Well-defined row of spots forming mostly continuous dark line along entire base of anal fin, with small concavities between individual fin-ray bases. Dorsal to that, second dark line of spots along lower limit of hypaxial musculature, two lines posteriorly converging to end of anal-fin base. Individual fin-rays of all fins irregularly outlined with interspersed narrow dark fields, most intense on first pectoral-fin ray and least intense on pelvic fins. Bases of pelvic and pectoral fins with intense irregular dark fields. Base of dorsal fin with nearly continuous dark line. Ray-bearing margin of hypural plate intensely darkly outlined. Densely-set melanophores at dorsal region of peritoneum forming large abdominal dark region between pectoral region and anus, visible through thin abdominal wall. One specimen in MZUSP 72077 abnormally dark, due both to expanded dark chromatophores throughout body and head, and also to darker than usual background color (latter trait perhaps result of preservation history). Other than for its intensity, general coloration pattern of that specimen matching that of normal specimens.

Geographical distribution. Rhinotridens britskii is known from the lowland Amazon basin at rio Solimões, rio Purus, rio Madeira, and Ati-Paraná (a long river-like channel linking the rio Solimões with the rio Japurá), all in Amazonas State, Brazil, and in the river confluence at Río Amazonas called Río Loretoyacu in Colombia, and Río Yanayaco in Peru ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).

Ecological notes. Data on the ecology of the specimens collected in the type-locality were kindly provided by two of the collectors, F. C. T. Lima and C. Moreira. The igarapé Boa Vista at the collection site ( Fig. 12 View FIGURE 12 ) has lightly-stained black water, diverging in that regard from a majority of other water courses in that region, which are mostly clear water. There had been heavy rains in the days preceding the collection, which flooded the igapó forest. Specimens of R. britskii were collected in the flooded forest, swimming in midwater. Specimens of R. britskii have been recorded from the same collection event as Tridentopsis brevis (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889) on at least two occasions: on the type-locality of the former (MNRJ 53146) and at Ati-Paraná (a long river-like channel linking the rio Solimões with the rio Japurá) (MZUSP 36303). This indicates that the two species are sympatric. It is unknown whether or not they were also syntopic.

Etymology. Named in honor of Heraldo Britski, first collector of specimens of the new species, in recognition of his pivotal role in the development of ichthyology in Brazil and also as a token of his 90 th birthday in 2024. A noun in a genitive case.

Conservation status. Rhinotridens britskii is spread over a large geographic range, including localities in Brazil (rio Purus, rio Madeira, and Ati-Paraná), in Colombia (Río Loreto-Yacco) and in Peru (Río Yanayacu). No significant threats to the species have been identified in its area of occurrence. Thus, we believe R. britskii can be provisionally classified as Least Concern (LC) according to the categories and criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee, 2022).

Remarks. Specimens MCZ 52186, MZUSP 72977 and MZUSP 121256, respectively from Colombia, Brazil (rio Madeira) and Peru, conform to all external characteristics of R. britskii as in the Diagnosis and generally also fit within or adjacent to the morphometric ranges of other specimens from the type-locality and surroundings, although often in one end of the spectrum. The only significant difference found was in caudal peduncle depth of MCZ 52186 and MZUSP 121256 (6.5–6.8 and 6.9% SL, respectively), less deep than that of types (7.4–8.9% SL) ( Tab. 2 View TABLE 2 ). This difference alone is not enough for inferring taxonomic differentiation, although it may indicate some form of geographical variation, pending additional study and material from respective localities. For these reasons, the specimens are not designated as paratypes.