Graphium bouyeri birketsmithi, Bollino & Bouyer, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.57800/faunitaxys-12(8) |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BBF288DB-82A0-457A-935E-90783F7247E0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15352828 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EF5E87B8-FF8E-FFA4-FC45-376ABB0B123A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Graphium bouyeri birketsmithi |
status |
subsp. nov. |
Graphium bouyeri birketsmithi n. ssp.
A1: Transverse bars of the FW discal cell very thin.
B1: Postdiscal marks in FW cells M3-CuA2 smaller and separated by a dark space along veins.
C1: Outer margin of the FWs more prominently concave at vein M2.
D1:Dark submarginal spots in R1 and R2 of the hindwing rectangular, covering more than half the corresponding space.
Larger: FW length 41.07-45.87, average 44.15, n= 33 males.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 3 View Fig ). – General scheme typical of the Graphium policenes group. Dorsal terminal process with a large internal upper branch, and the external lower branch formed by a serrated basal tooth. The dorsal harpe is more finely serrated than in G. policenes .
Etymology. – The new subspecies is dedicated to the late Jorgen Birket-Smith (*1920-†1983), who first (1960) suspected that a species closely related to Graphium policenes existed in Cameroon and neighboring regions.
Distribution. – Western-central Africa, including Cameroon, Republic of Congo, western Democratic Republic of Congo.
We take this opportunity to summarize in a diagram the external differences between Graphium policenes and Graphium bouyeri plus Graphium liponesco (the latter two easily distinguishable from each other due to the different male genital pattern) ( Fig. 3 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.