Zodarion jakubi Shafaie & Pekár, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2025.1016.3063 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:971686D8-3C1F-4F8F-9AA1-FBB8BC97E175 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17245177 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F910AB10-A154-FF88-1632-FED9501DFE3B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Zodarion jakubi Shafaie & Pekár |
status |
sp. nov. |
Zodarion jakubi Shafaie & Pekár sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
Figs 56–58 View Fig View Fig View Fig , 106 View Fig
Diagnosis
Closely related to Zodarion simplex Jocqué, 2011 by similar median and tibial apophyses, but differs by a stouter retrolateral tibial apophysis (cf. Fig. 57C, F View Fig and Jocqué 2011: fig. 8), and the embolar tip gently curved distally (vs not curved, cf. Fig. 57B, 57E View Fig and Jocqué 2011: fig. 7). The female specimen can be distinguished from other species by simple, fusiform atria of epigyne ( Fig. 58A–B View Fig ).
Etymology
The specific name is dedicated to Jakub Pekár, the second author’s son, who co-collected the material of this new species.
Type material
Holotype
OMAN • ♂; Wadi Bani Habib ; 23.069° N, 57.604° E; 652 m a.s.l.; 31 Jan. 2023; J. Pekár leg.; NMP P6A 7506 View Materials . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
OMAN • 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; NMP P6A 7507 View Materials , NMP P6A 7508 View Materials GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
OMAN • 14 juv.; same collection data as for holotype; CMU GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Wadi Ghul ; 23.205° N, 57.213° E; 1031 m a.s.l.; 13 Feb. 2022; S. Pekár leg.; CMU GoogleMaps • 1 ♀, 4 juv.; Misfah ; 23.228° N, 57.135° E; 1000 m a.s.l.; 28 Jan. 2023; S. Pekár leg.; CMU GoogleMaps .
Description
Male ( holotype NMP P6A 7506)
HABITUS ( Fig. 56A–B View Fig ). Carapace, chelicerae, sternum, labium, gnathocoxae and spinnerets pale, with no pattern except for a dark ocular area on carapace; ocular area almost slender. Legs uniformly yellow. Palpal segments pale except cymbium, cymbium light brown anteriorly and pale posteriorly. Abdomen crumpled; dorsum white anteriorly and dark posteriorly, venter pale; PVS present.
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 2.35; carapace 1.2 long, 0.9 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.13, ALE = PME= PLE 0.07, AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.02, ALE–ALE 0.3, PME–PME 0.15, PLE–PLE 0.32, PME–PLE 0.03. Legs: I 6.03 (1.45, 0.76, 1.48, 1.04, 1.3), II 5.8 (1.3, 0.72, 1.34, 1.45, 0.99), III 5.02 (1.3, 0.67, 1.01, 1.04, 1), IV 6.9 (1.65, 0.76, 1.56, 1.61, 1.32). Palp: 1.24 (0.42, 0.22, 0.1, 0.5).
PALP ( Fig. 57A–F View Fig ). RTA triangular, with a dentate tip. Cymbium elongated, cymbial tip as long as bulb. Tegulum simple, without any posterior process. Median apophysis sickle-shaped. Embolus simple, embolar tip slightly curved distally.
Female ( paratype NMP P6A 7507)
HABITUS ( Fig. 56C–D View Fig ). Prosoma entirely similar to that of male. Abdomen light brown dorsally and pale ventrally; PVS present.
MEASUREMENTS. Total length 2.63; carapace 1.24 long, 0.93 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.14, ALE=PME = PLE 0.07, AME–AME 0.05, AME–ALE 0.03, ALE–ALE 0.33, PME–PME 0.17, PLE–PLE 0.37, PME–PLE 0.03. Legs: I (1.76, 0.38, 1.33, 1.52, tarsus missing), II (1.6, other segments missing), III 5.36 (1.47, 0.29, 1.26, 1.56, 0.78), IV (2.02, other segments missing). Palp: 1.12 (0.43, 0.16, 0.1, 0.56).
EPIGYNE ( Fig. 58A–D View Fig ). Epigyne with fusiform atria. Posterior margin of epigyne distinctly incised and covered by a medium-sized hood; spermathecae small, divergent and separated by 5.46 times their diameter. Vulva very simple, comprising a pair of large and fusiform wings, situated obliquely downward to each other and ended to spermathecal heads.
Size variation
Total body length 2.35–2.66 in males (N =2) and 2.63–3.53 in females (N=4). Carapace length/width 1.2/ 0.86–0.9 in males and 1.24–1.66/ 0.93–1.26 in females.
Distribution
At present, known only from Oman. This is the first report of the family Zodariidae in Oman.
NMP |
National Museum (Prague) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |