Creagrutus, Gunther, 1864
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252010000300001 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17817995 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD4787B0-019A-FF25-FF16-FA81C60AA27C |
|
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
|
scientific name |
Creagrutus |
| status |
|
Genus Creagrutus View in CoL .
As mentioned in the preceding node, a test for the monophyly of Creagrutus is beyond the objectives of this paper and this issue was studied in detail by Vari & Harold (2001), who diagnosed this genera supported by 11 synapomorphies. The two species herein analyzed were included in a large polytomy of 41 species of the genus in the hypothesis of Vari & Harold (2001).
Synapomorphies:
1. Longitudinal ridge in quadrate bordering adductor mandibulae muscle ventrally and, to some degree, laterally (152): (0> 1) present. Paralleled in the Iguanodectinae and in node 209. 2. Shape of dentigerous plate of fifth ceratobranchial (204): (1> 0) rounded, with posterior notch. Paralleled in the Iguanodectinae and in Axelrodia lindeae .
3. Articulation between ventral process of mesocoracoid and dorsal margin of scapula (245): (0> 1) present and broad. Paralleled in Gymnocharacinus bergii .
4. Number of unbranched anal-fin rays (285):(1> 0) three or fewer. Paralleled in Iguanodectes geisleri and Paracheirodon axelrodi . 5. Number of ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (302): (0> 1) 12 or more. Paralleled in the Bryconops clade, in node 229, and in Salminus brasiliensis .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
SubFamily |
Acestrorhynchinae |
