Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2024-0108 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77F9CE7F-F821-4D64-9DDB-A9CB358F0119 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14682556 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD2E87D2-FFBC-FFC0-FD53-FDB600B7CC79 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862 |
status |
|
Tribe Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862 -1863
Included genera.
Acanthicus Agassiz, 1829:2 View in CoL (in Spix, Agassiz, 1829).
Type-species: Acanthicus hystrix Spix & Agassiz, 1829 View in CoL .
Leporacanthicus Isbrücker, Nijssen, 1989:544 View in CoL . Type-species: Leporacanthicus galaxias Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1989 View in CoL .
Megalancistrus Isbrücker, 1980:52 . Type-species: Chaetostoma gigas Boulenger, 1895 .
Pseudacanthicus Bleeker, 1862:2 . Type-species: Chaetostomus serratus Valenciennes, 1840 (in Cuvier, Valenciennes, 1840). Synonym: Stoniella Fowler, 1914.
Phylogenetic diagnosis. Anterohyal greatest width greater than half its length (1:1), loss of flap on quadrate extending below symplectic foramen (66:0), mesethmoid disk extending anterior to main body of mesethmoid (101:1), large fenestrae in compound pterotic (109:1, reversed in Leporacanthicus ), tip of transverse process of Weberian complex centrum not contacting compound pterotic (135:1, reversed in Leporacanthicus ), eight or more dorsal-fin rays (142:1), hypertrophied odontodes along snout margin (188>1), and keels of lateral plates well developed (198:1).
Comparative diagnosis. Acanthicini can be separated from all other Hypostominae except some Pterygoplichthys Gill, 1858 (particularly P. weberi ) by having lateral-plate keels made of long, stout odontodes, from all other Hypostominae except Colossimystax and Pterygoplichthys by having more than seven dorsal-fin rays, and from Pterygoplichthys with keels by having strongly evertible cheek odontodes ( vs. weakly evertible), by having fewer odontodes dorsal and ventral to keel rows ( vs. odontodes normally distributed). In addition, Acanthicus can be separated from Pterygoplichthys by lacking an adipose fin ( vs. adipose fin present), Acanthicus and Megalancistrus can be separated from Pterygoplichthys by having compound pterotic extending beyond posteriormost insertion of pectoral fin ( vs. maximally through ~3/4 of pectoral-fin base); and Leporacanthicus and Pseudacanthicus can be separated from Pterygoplichthys by having 10 or fewer teeth per jaw ramus ( vs. more than 20).
Geographical distribution. Restricted to larger, main river channel habitats in cis-Andean drainages from the Paraná and São Francisco basins northward, including the Amazon and Orinoco basins and north-flowing Guiana Shield basins.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Hypostominae |
Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862
Armbruster, Jonathan W. & Lujan, Nathan K. 2024 |
Leporacanthicus Isbrücker, Nijssen, 1989:544
Isbrucker, Nijssen 1989: 544 |
Leporacanthicus galaxias Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1989
Isbrucker & Nijssen 1989 |
Megalancistrus Isbrücker, 1980:52
Isbrucker 1980: 52 |
Chaetostoma gigas
Boulenger 1895 |
Pseudacanthicus
Bleeker 1862: 2 |
Chaetostomus serratus
Valenciennes 1840 |
Acanthicus
Agassiz 1829: 2 |