Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862

Armbruster, Jonathan W. & Lujan, Nathan K., 2024, New tribe-level classification of Hypostominae (Loricariidae) based on optimization of morphological states on DNA-based relationships, with descriptions of three new tribes and two new genera, Neotropical Ichthyology 22 (4), pp. e 240108-e 240108 : e240108-240108

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-2024-0108

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77F9CE7F-F821-4D64-9DDB-A9CB358F0119

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14682556

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD2E87D2-FFBC-FFC0-FD53-FDB600B7CC79

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862
status

 

Tribe Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862 -1863

Included genera.

Acanthicus Agassiz, 1829:2 View in CoL (in Spix, Agassiz, 1829).

Type-species: Acanthicus hystrix Spix & Agassiz, 1829 View in CoL .

Leporacanthicus Isbrücker, Nijssen, 1989:544 View in CoL . Type-species: Leporacanthicus galaxias Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1989 View in CoL .

Megalancistrus Isbrücker, 1980:52 . Type-species: Chaetostoma gigas Boulenger, 1895 .

Pseudacanthicus Bleeker, 1862:2 . Type-species: Chaetostomus serratus Valenciennes, 1840 (in Cuvier, Valenciennes, 1840). Synonym: Stoniella Fowler, 1914.

Phylogenetic diagnosis. Anterohyal greatest width greater than half its length (1:1), loss of flap on quadrate extending below symplectic foramen (66:0), mesethmoid disk extending anterior to main body of mesethmoid (101:1), large fenestrae in compound pterotic (109:1, reversed in Leporacanthicus ), tip of transverse process of Weberian complex centrum not contacting compound pterotic (135:1, reversed in Leporacanthicus ), eight or more dorsal-fin rays (142:1), hypertrophied odontodes along snout margin (188>1), and keels of lateral plates well developed (198:1).

Comparative diagnosis. Acanthicini can be separated from all other Hypostominae except some Pterygoplichthys Gill, 1858 (particularly P. weberi ) by having lateral-plate keels made of long, stout odontodes, from all other Hypostominae except Colossimystax and Pterygoplichthys by having more than seven dorsal-fin rays, and from Pterygoplichthys with keels by having strongly evertible cheek odontodes ( vs. weakly evertible), by having fewer odontodes dorsal and ventral to keel rows ( vs. odontodes normally distributed). In addition, Acanthicus can be separated from Pterygoplichthys by lacking an adipose fin ( vs. adipose fin present), Acanthicus and Megalancistrus can be separated from Pterygoplichthys by having compound pterotic extending beyond posteriormost insertion of pectoral fin ( vs. maximally through ~3/4 of pectoral-fin base); and Leporacanthicus and Pseudacanthicus can be separated from Pterygoplichthys by having 10 or fewer teeth per jaw ramus ( vs. more than 20).

Geographical distribution. Restricted to larger, main river channel habitats in cis-Andean drainages from the Paraná and São Francisco basins northward, including the Amazon and Orinoco basins and north-flowing Guiana Shield basins.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Order

Siluriformes

Family

Loricariidae

SubFamily

Hypostominae

Loc

Acanthicini Bleeker, 1862

Armbruster, Jonathan W. & Lujan, Nathan K. 2024
2024
Loc

Leporacanthicus Isbrücker, Nijssen, 1989:544

Isbrucker, Nijssen 1989: 544
1989
Loc

Leporacanthicus galaxias Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1989

Isbrucker & Nijssen 1989
1989
Loc

Megalancistrus Isbrücker, 1980:52

Isbrucker 1980: 52
1980
Loc

Chaetostoma gigas

Boulenger 1895
1895
Loc

Pseudacanthicus

Bleeker 1862: 2
1862
Loc

Chaetostomus serratus

Valenciennes 1840
1840
Loc

Acanthicus

Agassiz 1829: 2
1829
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF