Asterocheres angelicae, Bahiana & Farias & Neves & Johnsson, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5696.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0326BE2F-C589-4E93-955C-EFD44035CB92 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DC438877-FFBB-FF83-49DB-F9F6F483FA2B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Asterocheres angelicae |
status |
sp. nov. |
Asterocheres angelicae sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:
( Figs. 11–13 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 )
Diagnosis: Asterocheres . Female antennule 20-segmented. Antenna with endopod 3-segmented, with armature formula: 0,1,2. Mandibular palp 1-segmented. Maxillule with 4 setae on each lobe. Maxilliped 5-segmented, with armature formula (0,0,0,1,1+claw).
Material examined: Holotype adult female ( UFBA 3986 ) dissected on a permanent slide . Paratype adult female ( UFBA3987 ) preserved in ethanol. Specimens found associated with the sponge Callyspongia sp. Duchassaing & Michelotti, 1864 from a private terminal in Salvador City ( 12°58’19.7”S, 38°30’56.9”W), Bahia State, Brazil. Collected by the LABIMAR team on September 29, 2019 GoogleMaps .
Description of a female: Body ( Fig. 11a View FIGURE 11 ) measuring 446 µm long and 256 µm wide, typically cyclopiform, with oval, shield-like prosome and cylindrical urosome. Cephalosome with sinuous posterior margin. Second and third pedigerous somites with slightly curved lateral margins. Third pedigerous somite extended and covering fourth and fifth pedigerous somites, reaching genital double-somite. Prosome 322 µm long and 256 µm wide. Length:width ratio=1:0.7. Urosome ( Fig. 11b View FIGURE 11 ), 4-segmented, fifth pedigerous somite 31 µm long and 89 µm wide. Genital double-somite measuring 69 µm long and 78 µm maximum width, length:width ratio=0.8:1. Two postgenital somites, both wider than long (20×48, 30×40 µm, respectively); Prosome:urosome ratio=1:0.4. Caudal rami as long as wide 16×17 µm. Length:width ratio=0.9:1 µm, armed with 6 plumose setae.
Antennule ( Fig. 11c View FIGURE 11 ) 240 µm long (not including setae), 20-segmented. Length of segments in proximal to distal order: 27, 9, 8, 9, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 16, 13, 16, 12, 16, 20, 24, 8, 14, and 5 µm long, respectively. Segmental homologies as follows: 1(I)-2, 2(II)-2, 3(III)-1, 4(IV)-2, 5(V)-2, 6(VI)-2, 7(VII)-1, 8(VIII)-1, 9(IX–XII)-6, 10(XIII)-1, 11(XIV)- 1, 12(XV)-1, 13(XVI)-2, 14(XVII)-1, 15(XVIII)-0, 16(XIX)-1, 17(XX)-2, 18(XXI)-2+aesthetasc, 19(XXII–XXV)- 4, 20(XXVI–XXVIII)-7. Aesthetasc 68 μm long.
Antenna ( Fig. 11d View FIGURE 11 ) biramous, 162 µm long, including terminal claw. Small unarmed coxa 13 µm long; basis 45 µm long without ornamentation. Exopod 1-segmented, 5 µm long, with 2 apical unequally-sized setae. Endopod 3-segmented; first segment 36 µm long, with outer margin ornamented with setules; second segment triangular-shaped, 10 µm long, armed with apical seta; third segment measuring 16 µm long, with outer margin ornamented with setules, and armed with lateral seta and distal slender seta. All setae naked. Terminal claw 42 µm long.
Oral cone ( Fig. 12a View FIGURE 12 ) almost reaching first leg intercoxal plate. Mandible ( Fig. 12a View FIGURE 12 ) consisting of stylet 121 µm long, slightly widened in the medial portion. Mandibular palp 1-segmented, measuring 32 µm long without ornamentation, and 2 distal equal setae.
Maxillule ( Fig. 12b View FIGURE 12 ) bilobed, both lobes laterally naked. Inner lobe 40 µm long, armed with 3 naked setae and a long plumose seta. Outer lobe 15 µm long, armed with 4 naked setae.
Maxilla ( Fig. 12c View FIGURE 12 ) 183 µm long, comprising unarmed syncoxa 69 µm long and curved claw measuring 114 µm long, armed with seta and ornamented with row of setules distally.
Maxilliped ( Fig. 12d View FIGURE 12 ) 5-segmented, 141 µm long; syncoxa 42 µm long, unarmed; basis 74 µm long, without ornamentation. Endopod 3-segmented, segments measuring 17, 8, and 25 µm long, respectively, with armature formula (0,1,1+claw). Claw measuring 57 µm long, elongated and distally curved. All setae naked.
Legs 1–4 ( Figs. 13a–d View FIGURE 13 ) biramous, with 3-segmented rami. Armature formula as follows:
Basis of leg 1 ( Fig. 13a View FIGURE 13 ) with row of setules on inner margin. First exopodal segment of leg 1 ( Fig. 13a View FIGURE 13 ) with robust spine, reaching third exopodal segment, and second exopodal segment with very small spine. Coxa of legs 2 and 4 ( Figs. 13 View FIGURE 13 b-d) with row setules on outer margins. All exopodal segments ( Fig. 13a View FIGURE 13 ) showing spinules on outer margins, except first exopodal segment of leg 1 which has row of setules. Legs 1 and 3 ( Figs. 13 View FIGURE 13 a-c) showing spinules on second and third endopodal segments; all other endopodal segments showing setules, except naked first endopodal segment of leg 1 ( Fig. 13a View FIGURE 13 ). Distal spines of third exopodal segment of legs 2 to 4 ( Figs. 13 View FIGURE 13 b-d) strongly built, almost as long as proximal setae.
Leg 5 ( Fig. 13e View FIGURE 13 ) free segment, 36 µm long, ornamented with setules in inner and outer margins, armed with 2 long terminal setae. All setae naked.
Adult male: Unknown.
Etymology. The species name “ angelicae ” is given in honor of Sister Joana Angélica, a conceptionist nun and martyr of the Brazilian Independence War, who died when resisting the invasion of the Convent of Lapa, and has her name included in the book of the Heroes and Heroines of the Country.
Remarks: Asterocheres angelicae sp. nov. belongs to the group of Asterocheres species with 20-segmented antennules, a feature shared with 26 congeners: A. banderaae Kim & Lee, 2023 ; A. bimbarrensis Bispo, Johnsson & Neves, 2006 ; A. crinoidicola Humes, 2000 ; A. espinosai Varela, Ortiz & Lalana, 2007 , A. eurychelatus Kim & Lee, 2024 , A. galeatus Kim, 2010 , A. halichondriae Stock, 1966 , A. maxillatus Stock, 1987 , A. neptunei Johnsson, 2001 , A. oricurvus Kim, 2010 , A. planus Kim, 2010 , A. proboscideus Stock, 1966 , A. processus Kim & Lee, 2024 , A. quadridens Kim, 2016 , A. rai Kim & Min, 2013 , A. scutellatus Kim & Lee, 2024 , A. sensilis Kim, 2010 , A. simplex Schirl, 1973 , A. siphunculus Bahia, Canário, Neves & Johnsson, 2012, A. spinosus Kim & Min, 2013 , A. stocki Nair & Pillai, 1984 , A. tenuipes Kim, 2010 , A. tetraodontis Kim, & Lee, 2024 , A. tricuspis Kim, 2010 , A. tridentatus Kim & Lee, 2024 , A. trisetatus Kim, 2010 .
Asterocheres angelicae sp. nov. can be differentiated from A. banderaae , A. eurychelatus , A. galeatus , A. halichondriae , A. oricurvus , A. planus , A. processus , A. quadridens , A. rai , A. scutellatus , A. sensilis , A. spinosus , A. tenuipes , A. tetraodontis , A. tricuspis , A. tridentatus , and A. trisetatus by having a 5-segmented maxilliped, while those species exhibit 6-segmented maxilliped ( Stock 1966b; Kim 2010; 2016; Kim & Min 2013; Kim & Lee 2023; 2024).
Oral cone reaching leg 1 intercoxal plate on the new species easily differentiates it from A. proboscideus , which has the oral cone reaching the caudal rami ( Stock 1966b; Bandera & Conradi 2013).
Asterocheres angelicae sp. nov. shows two distal setae on the antennal exopod, differing from A. crinoidicola View in CoL , A. halicondriae , A. maxillatus View in CoL , and A. neptunei View in CoL which show three setae ( Stock 1966b; 1987; Humes 2000; Johnsson et al. 2001; Bandera & Conradi 2013).
Finally, A. angelicae sp. nov. can be easily differentiated from A. bimbarrensis View in CoL , A. espinosai View in CoL , A. simplex View in CoL , and A. stocki View in CoL by having a 1-segmented, while congeners have 2-segmented mandibular palp ( Schirl 1973; Nair & Pillai 1984; Varela 2012; Bispo et al. 2006; Varela et al. 2007)
Key to the Brazilian species of Asterocheres View in CoL :
1. Female antennule 19-segmented.................................................. A. crenulatus Johnsson, 1998 View in CoL Female antennule 20-segmented or more.................................................................. 2
2. Female antennule 20-segmented......................................................................... 3 Female antennule 21-segmented......................................................................... 7
3. Leg 5 armed with 4 setae....................................................... A. tetrasetosus Johnsson, 1998 Leg 5 armed with less than 4 setae....................................................................... 4
4. Leg 5 armed with 2 setae.......................................................... A. neptunei Johnsson, 2001 Leg 5 armed with 3 setae............................................................................... 5
5. Maxilliped 4-segmented..................................................... A. siphunculus Bahia et al., 2012 Maxilliped 5-segmented............................................................................... 6
6. Mandibular palp 1-segmented, maxillule inner and outer lobes with 4 and 3 setae, respectively........................................................................................... A. bimbarrensis Bispo & Johnsson, 2006 Mandibular palp 2-segmented, maxillule lobes with 4 setae................................... A. angelicae sp. nov.
7. Maxilliped 5-segmented............................................................... A. quiteriae sp. nov. Maxilliped 6-segmented.................................................................. A. felipae sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Asterocheres angelicae
Bahiana, Bruna, Farias, Amilcar, Neves, Elizabeth & Johnsson, Rodrigo 2025 |
Asterocheres angelicae
Bahiana & Farias & Neves & Johnsson 2025 |
A. angelicae
Bahiana & Farias & Neves & Johnsson 2025 |
A. espinosai
Varela, Ortiz & Lalana 2007 |
A. bimbarrensis
Bispo, Johnsson & Neves 2006 |
A. neptunei
Johnsson 2001 |
A. crinoidicola
Humes 2000 |
A. maxillatus
Stock 1987 |
A. stocki
Nair & Pillai 1984 |
A. simplex
Schirl 1973 |
A. halicondriae
Stock 1966 |