Bactrochondria hoi, (Pillai, 1985)

Ho, Ju-Shey, Kim, Il-Hoi & Kumar, A. Biju, 2000, Chondracanthid copepods parasitic on flatfishes of Kerala, India, Journal of Natural History 34 (5), pp. 709-735 : 717-720

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.1080/002229300299372

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10237821

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7A57A021-FFAE-FF87-FEA1-FA255329FD17

treatment provided by

Carolina

scientific name

Bactrochondria hoi
status

 

Bactrochondri a hoi ( Pillai, 1985)

( figures 5-6 View FIG View FIG )

Material examined. Nine adult ♀♀ (seven with attached ♂) found on gill fi laments of Cynoglossus lida (Bleeker) : one collected on 11 March 1994 and eight on 20 July 1994.

Female. Body ( figure 5A View FIG ) elongated and cylindrical, measuring 2.26-3.02 mm long. Head ( figure 5B View FIG ) longer than wide, 495✕ 385 μ m (not including inflated antennule), with small rounded knob at each anterolateral corner and distinctly swollen oral region ( figure 5C View FIG ). First pediger forming neck region ( figure 5C View FIG ). Second pediger fused with remaining prosomal somites into a long, cylindrical trunk. Genital double somite ( figure 5D View FIG ) distinctly wider than long, with abdomen attaching to it like a narrow ring. Caudal ramus ( figure 5E View FIG ) a spiniform pointed process bearing three setae and a tubercle. Egg sac not seen.

Antennule ( figure 5F View FIG ) fl eshy, with inflated base tipped with a short, setae-bearing process; armature being (from proximal to distal) 1-1-1-2-2-8. Antenna ( figure 5G View FIG ) two-segmented; terminal segment sharply curved (broken in dissected specimens), with annular sculptures in bent area. Labrum ( figure 5H View FIG ) with posterolateral knob and smooth posterior margin. Terminal blade of mandible ( figure 5I View FIG ) bearing 22 to 24 teeth on convex (inner) side and 13 to 16 teeth on concave (outer) side. Maxillule ( figure 5J View FIG ) with two terminal elements and a subterminal process tipped with three tubercles. Maxilla ( figure 5K View FIG ) two-segmented; first segment robust and unarmed; second segment bearing one small, simple seta, one large seta with hyaline tip and a row of 14 to 18 teeth on terminal process. Maxilliped ( figure 5L View FIG ) three-segmented; constructed roughly as in B. papilla with subchelate appearance. Leg 1 ( figure 6A View FIG ) and leg 2 ( figure 6B View FIG ) as in B. papilla .

Male. Body ( figure 6C View FIG ) 151 μ m long, with swollen cephalosome and cylindrical metasome and urosome. Genital somite ( figure 6D View FIG ) with usual ventrolateral ridges. Abdomen ( figure 6D View FIG ) indistinguishably fused with genital somite. Caudal ramus ( figure 6D View FIG ) a naked spiniform process. Antennule ( figure 6E View FIG ) short and stubby, armature being 1-1-1-2-1-7. Antenna ( figure 7F View FIG ) two-segmented and without armature. Mandible ( figure 6G View FIG ) with fewer teeth on terminal blade, 11 on convex side and ten on concave side. Maxillule ( figure 6H View FIG ) tipped with three elements. Maxilla ( figure 6I View FIG ) with 12 to 14 teeth on terminal process. Maxilliped ( figure 6J View FIG ) two-segmented, lacking terminal claw. Legs 1 and 2 missing.

Remarks. In addition to the three differences enumerated in the Remarks to B. papilla , the two species can be distinguished further by having in the present species more teeth (16-18 vs. eight or nine) on the terminal process of the female maxilla and in lacking legs entirely in the male.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF