Campoplex monochroma, Han & Achterberg & Chen, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5066.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6B3D85E9-31FE-4D08-8E15-BA8959DD1988 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5653921 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/039687B1-4735-6C65-9DD1-1BC008A579DC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Campoplex monochroma |
status |
sp. nov. |
Campoplex monochroma sp. nov.
Figs. 51–52 View FIGURE 51 View FIGURE 52
Material examined. Holotype: female, Zhejiang, Lishui Fengyangshan, 9.VIII.2003, Wu Qiong, No 20042321 ( ZJUH) . Paratypes: 1 female, Guangdong, Shixing Chebaling , 25. V.2002, Xu Zaifu, No 201806185 ; 3 females, Henan, Neixiang Wangoulinchang , 11.VII. 1998, Chen Xuexin, No 985939 ; 1 female, Jilin, Fusong Donggangzhen , 30.VIII.1989, Li Lin, No 974169 ; 1 female, Neimeng, Gegentala , 16.VIII.2000, Ma Yun, No 200100852 ; 1 female, Shaanxi, Hanzhong Liubaxian , 20.VIII.2013, Tu Binbin, No 201309161 ; 3 females, Shenyang National Forest Park, 16. VII.2011, Yan Chenjin, No 201103694, 201103690, 201103695 ; 3 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan , 10.VIII.2003, Liu Jingxian, No 201804841, 201805167, 201804175 ; 2 females, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan , 22.VIII.1982, Song Qisheng, No 826561, 826560 ; 1 female, Zhejiang, Longquan Fengyangshan , 16.VIII.1982, Le Yanhua, No 826757 ; 1 female, Zhejiang, Qingyuan Baishanzu , 30.VII.1993, Wu Hong, No 945170 ; 1 female, Zhejiang, Suichang Jiulongshan , 18.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944491 ; 4 females, Zhejiang, Songyang , 17.VII.1994, Xu Zaifu, No 944382, 943976, 944195, 944197 .
Description. Female ( Fig. 51 View FIGURE 51 ) holotype. Body length 6.2 mm, fore wing length 4.3 mm.
Head. Antenna with at least 34 flagellomeres; first flagellomere 1.15× longer than second flagellomere. Face ( Fig. 52E View FIGURE 52 ) granulose-punctate. Clypeus ( Fig. 52E View FIGURE 52 ) punctate, punctures larger than that on face, slightly convex, apical margin arched, thick medially. Malar space granulose, 0.5× basal width of mandible. Mandible with lamella basally, upper tooth equal to the length of lower tooth. Frons granulose, median carina absent. Vertex granulose. Interocellar distance ( Fig. 52F View FIGURE 52 ) 1.5× ocello-ocular distance and 1.9× distance between median and lateral ocelli. Temple granulose, subpolished. Occipital carina evenly arched, reaching hypostomal carina above mandible base.
Mesosoma. Pronotum punctate dorsally, subpolished, trans-striate below. Mesoscutum ( Fig. 52G View FIGURE 52 ) granulose punctate, becoming rugose in notaulic region anteriorly. Scutellum with sparse and minute punctures, rugose posteriorly. Metanotum rugose-punctate. Mesopleuron ( Fig. 52B View FIGURE 52 ) punctate, trans-striate below tegula, speculum smooth and shiny. Metapleuron ( Fig. 52B View FIGURE 52 ) punctate. Propodeum ( Fig. 52C View FIGURE 52 ) with area basalis triangular, long and narrow; area superomedia granulose medially and short rugose laterally, polished; area petiolaris trans-striate; area superomedia confluent with area petiolaris, slightly depressed; all carina distinctly developed; propodeal spiracle small and oval.
Wing. Fore wing ( Fig. 52A View FIGURE 52 ) areolet present and with a moderate stalk emitting 2m-cu vein from its apical part. Marginal cell short, distal part of surrounding vein 2.0× longer than proximal one. Vein 1cu-a opposite M&RS. External angles of second discal cell acute (65°). Hind wing with nervellus inclivous, intercepted at lower 0.3 of its length.
Legs. Hind femur 4.0× longer than wide. Inner spur of hind tibia 0.5× as long as first tarsomere of hind tarsus. Tarsal claws pectinate.
Metasoma. First metasomal segment ( Fig. 52H View FIGURE 52 ) round in cross-section of basal 0.3, with weak dorso-lateral carina, and with a shallow groove. First tergite 2.5× longer than width of postpetiole. Postpetiole and second tergite granulose, mat. Second tergite 0.6× as long as first tergite, 0.85× its apical width; thyridium round, its distance from basal margin of tergite equal to its diameter. Third tergite 0.8× as long as its apical width. Metasoma not compressed apically. Sixth and seventh tergites without emarginations. Ovipositor sheath approx. 1.7× longer than hind femur, ovipositor ( Fig. 52D View FIGURE 52 ) gradually upcurved.
Colour. Black. Mandible except teeth, palpi, fore and middle legs entirely and tegula, yellow with telotarsus brownish; scape and pedicel yellowish brown anteriorly and brown dorsally; hind coxa black, trochanter except basally, femur and tibia yellowish brown, tibia unicolorous, slightly infuscated apically, tarsus brown; metasoma entirely black with second and third segments slightly blackish brown.
Variation. First flagellomere 1.1–1.25× second flagellomere; face granulose to granulose-punctate; frons with median carina absent or present; pronotum granulose-punctate to punctate dorsally; specimens from Shenyang province with ovipositor thinner; scape and pedicel entirely brown or yellowish-brown anteriorly; specimens from Henan province with hind tibia banded.
Distribution. China ( Guangdong, Henan, Jinlin, Neimeng, Shaanxi, Shenyang, Zhejiang).
Comparative diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. proportionis sp. nov., but differs from the latter by having second tergite 0.8–0.9× as long as its apical width, thyridium separated from the basal margin of tergite by its diameter, metasoma not compressed apically, malar space and frons granulose, and metanotum rugose-punctate.
Etymology. Name derived from “mono-” (Greek for “single”), and “chroma” (Greek for “colour”), because its hind tibia is unicolorous.
V |
Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Campopleginae |
Genus |